"Hillary's Email Scandal" with Bruce Moran
Hillary Rodham Clinton - Nobody’s fault but HRC herself. HRC and HRC’s staff delayed the information being given to FBI while HRC gave directives to her staffers / employees to review then bleach bit destroy 30,000 emails. Similarly, a greater problem exists now if it is discovered that classified information exists within the 600,000 plus emails found on Huma’s shared computer with her husband Anthony Weiner. Huma could face prosecution (for perjury) if the FBI investigation finds classified information existed where Huma did not disclose such classified information existed on her computer and/or HRC’s unsecured server – (lied to FBI as to cover up the matter).
 
In addition, if Huma did not disclose such classified information and its communication links what other information and links to classified information were not disclosed to the FBI investigators by HRC, HRC’s staffers, the DNC and the Clinton foundation (play to play) executives, staff and donors.
 
A) American voters will have to make a choice of made-up convoluted political email situation conundrum as put forth by HRC and her DNC surrogates where nothing will be found (worthless hearsay) so they can run out the clock to win the election:
 
B) Will American voters look at this situation as a larger highly involved national security problem at the Executive Branch (departments and agencies) with the new FBI investigation that will look into:
  1. More problems associated with the unsecured private server’s risks and exposures (it was reported that up to five foreign government espionage infiltrations (hacking incidents occurred) into the HRC’s private server. It should be noted the HRC emphatically indicated she was not hacked.
  2. Unknown breaches of national security or conflicts of interest which will now be disclosed,
  3. Lack of information being presented by HRC or her staffers (obstruction of justice) in an FBI investigation that must thoroughly look into classified information where-abouts at the Executive Branch – which cannot possibly be done in 8 days to determine if confidential, secret, top secret of Special Access Program information was at high risk, compromised or purposefully deleted. In other words: Who had the classified information and what conditions existed when they had such classified information.
  4. Possible other avenues collusion, obstruction of justice, conflict of interests, fraud, RICO or other criminal activity where a grand jury / special prosecutor may be needed with the past investigative findings, new findings (not innuendos) into criminal activity, and opening up a wider FBI investigation with a complete forensic classified information audit into USG agencies & departments especially the Department of State embassies and consulates, Clinton Foundation executives, employees and donors computers and devices and other HRC staffer’s computers and devices.
  5. HRC, HRC’s staffers and DNC prolonged giving information (evidence) to the FBI or House investigating committees
    Opening up an obstruction of justice door if classified information that was bleach bit (emails sent from Huma to HRC) is found on Huma’s computer or leads to other computers or devices with such destroyed bleach bit classified information on it going to HRC.
  6. A politically cold and highly calculated move by HRC, her staffers and the DNC to run out the clock to win the Presidential election on November 8th, 2016 so such critical national security FBI investigative findings would not be brought forward.
C) Private Computer Server Illegal - as soon as HRC had sworn in a Secretary of State the private server should have been directly moved into her office at foggy bottom then cleared and secured at the Department Of State technicians, experts or special matter experts.
 
D) Unsecured Emails Illegal for classified information: Confidential, Secret, Top Secret and Special Access Program
 
E) Co-mingled emails - State Department official business was not separated from Family business (Clinton Foundation) and personal business

 
FBI Investigation – Cannot Force An FBI Investigation – DNC, HRC and Podesta asking for a quick resolution. How can they ask for a quick resolution when they procrastinated and procrastinated to keep information from being disclosed to the FBI thus far:
 
 
  • Due Process is needed (Rule Of Law Must Be Followed)--- not again handcuffing a National Security Investigation by the FBI for political expediency purposes. There cannot be a compressed time schedule to report to the American public.There was not a “verdict” rendered in July during the initial part of the investigation. Therefore, there is no statute of limitations. AG Loretta Lynch deferred to FBI Director Comey not to prosecute so the door was left wide open to report back to Congress on any new matters which merited an investigation.
 
  • Analyze every one of the 600,000 plus emails track back and forth where the emails went and to what national security activity violations existed around it or any pay to play activity revolved around any business activity by Bill & Hillary Clinton.
     
  • FBI investigators need to see who the source agency is:CIA, White House, DoD, DNI, DHS as well as within the Department of State -- the Diplomatic Services at the 250 Posts in 180 countries with about 5,000 employees Embassies and Consulates - what type of information was being forward to HRC one way, back and forth, what the information initially indicated and what was redacted.

 

 
 FBI Investigation – Cannot Force An FBI Investigation –>
  • FBI investigators need to further analyze not only where information came from and was forwarded back and forth but who else received the same emails between HRC, Jake Sullivan, Cheryl Mills, Paul Combetta, Brian Pagliano, John Bentel, Heather Samuelson, Monica Hanley, Huma Abedin – and where else is this information being kept, but not disclosed.
 
  • Once FBI investigators start finding out national security violations or criminal activity existed in various parts of the government and Clinton Foundation more critical information will be forthcoming as individuals will not want to spend time in jail.
     
  • Last Monday November 1 release by Judicial Watch: Now members of the Secret Service who were stationed to guard Hillary and Bill Clinton will also have to be interviewed for testimony in the new FBI investigation.

 

 
  • (Washington, DC) November 1 Freedom Information Act– Judicial Watch today released new State Department documents detailing repeated efforts to hack into the unsecure non-state.gov email system used by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in November 2010. The hacks are detailed in email exchanges between State Department IT official Brian Pagliano and Bill Clinton aide Justin Cooper. The emails show the system was hacked 10 times in two days from November 27 to 29 2010.
 
  • The documents also reveal that Pagliano warned Cooper that because of an outside service vendor relied upon by the Clinton system, “we’d be susceptible to such an attack.” Cooper subsequently informed the U.S. Secret Service of the attempted hacks, providing agents with each of the ten reports and summaries Pagliano had provided him.

 

 
  • The new documents were among the nearly 15,000 Clinton emails discovered by the FBI, and obtained in response to an April 8, 2016, federal court order directing the Department of State to begin producing materials for Judicial Watch in response to a September 3, 2015 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-01441)). The lawsuit was filed after State failed to comply with an August 5, 2015 FOIA request seeking information about Bryan Pagliano’s involvement with Clinton’s email system.
 
  • The ten emails from Pagliano alerting Cooper to the apparent hacking attempt began on the morning of Saturday, November 27, 2010, and continued through Monday, November 29. Each of the ten alerts contained the same message, apparently from the cyber security firm Symantec: “There was a failed logon attempt logged on the server. To check who it was log onto the server and double click on the toolbox icon labeled Failed_Logon_Attempt

 

 

FBI POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST: House oversight committee headed by Congressman Jason Chaffetz wants FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe to recuse himself from the new FBI investigation. McCabe took over as FBI Deputy Directorship in February 1, 2016.
  • What is the FBI POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST: FBI Deputy Director McCabe’s wife, Jill McCabe, ran for office as a democratic local state senator in 2015 (not a federal seat) in which she had lost the race where she accepted donations of $675,000. Jill McCabe accepted monies for her campaign from close friends of the Clinton’s and democratic Governor Terry McAuliffe. Democratic Governor Terry McAuliffe’s PAC gave $475,000. The Democratic party gave $207,000.
 
It should be duly noted Chairmam Chaffetz on November 2, 2016 forwarded a CONFLICT OF INTEREST letter indicating Andrew McCabe should recuse himself from the new investigative proceedings. FBI Director James Comey’s letter went forth to Congress indicating the FBI had reopened the direction into HRC’s staffer Huma Abedin where 600,000 plus emails were discovered on her husband’s Anthony Weiner’s computer.
 
Requests by Chairman Chaffetz to FBI Director Comey:
 
• Turn in all documents relating to the ethics guidance received from the FBI regarding his wife’s campaign
 
• Give the date he became aware the State Department was pressuring the FBI to reverse its decision regarding the classification of one of Clinton’s emails
 
FBI POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST: House oversight committee
 
Requests by Chairman Chaffetz to FBI Director Comey:
 
• Provide information on whether he had any contact with the State Department regarding the classifications of Clinton’s emails
 
• Provide the date he first became aware the FBI had opened an investigation into Clinton’s email server
 
• Whether he was present for any briefings while he was associate deputy director
 
• Whether the personnel office in the Washington Field Office provided any support to the investigation prior to his promotion
It has been indicated (hearsay) that Deputy Director McCabe thwarted FBI agents from investigating the Clinton Foundation.

It has been also indicated (hearsay) that close to 100 FBI agents threatened to resign [placed letters of resignation on Director Comey’s desk) if FBI Director James Comey did not come forward to open up a new investigation into HRC.
 
What could be the reason for the FBI agents uprising:
 
  1. Director Comey finding no evidence to go forward with email – private server prosecution. AG Loretta Lynch historically makes the finding to prosecute
  2. Having FBI agents sign non-disclosure agreements when interviewing HRC and HRC’s staff
  3. FBI agents started to find mounting evidence in other matters
    Director Comey’s very unusual granting of immunity to 5 individuals: 2 HRC staffers, 2 employees and 1 state department director
  4. Not pursing the Clinton Foundation investigation where evidence may have been forthcoming – possibly thwarted by Deputy Director McCabe