"Hillary's Email Scandal" with
Bruce Moran |
Hillary Rodham Clinton - Nobody’s fault
but HRC herself. HRC and HRC’s staff delayed the information being
given to FBI while HRC gave directives to her staffers / employees
to review then bleach bit destroy 30,000 emails. Similarly, a
greater problem exists now if it is discovered that classified
information exists within the 600,000 plus emails found on Huma’s
shared computer with her husband Anthony Weiner. Huma could face
prosecution (for perjury) if the FBI investigation finds classified
information existed where Huma did not disclose such classified
information existed on her computer and/or HRC’s unsecured server –
(lied to FBI as to cover up the matter). |
|
In addition, if Huma did not disclose
such classified information and its communication links what other
information and links to classified information were not disclosed
to the FBI investigators by HRC, HRC’s staffers, the DNC and the
Clinton foundation (play to play) executives, staff and donors. |
|
A) American voters will have to make a
choice of made-up convoluted political email situation conundrum as
put forth by HRC and her DNC surrogates where nothing will be found
(worthless hearsay) so they can run out the clock to win the
election:
|
B) Will American voters look at this
situation as a larger highly involved national security problem at
the Executive Branch (departments and agencies) with the new FBI
investigation that will look into: |
- More problems associated
with the unsecured private server’s risks and
exposures (it was reported that up to five foreign
government espionage infiltrations (hacking
incidents occurred) into the HRC’s private server.
It should be noted the HRC emphatically indicated
she was not hacked.
- Unknown breaches of
national security or conflicts of interest which
will now be disclosed,
- Lack of information being
presented by HRC or her staffers (obstruction of
justice) in an FBI investigation that must
thoroughly look into classified information where-abouts
at the Executive Branch – which cannot possibly be
done in 8 days to determine if confidential, secret,
top secret of Special Access Program information was
at high risk, compromised or purposefully deleted.
In other words: Who had the classified information
and what conditions existed when they had such
classified information.
- Possible other avenues
collusion, obstruction of justice, conflict of
interests, fraud, RICO or other criminal activity
where a grand jury / special prosecutor may be
needed with the past investigative findings, new
findings (not innuendos) into criminal activity, and
opening up a wider FBI investigation with a complete
forensic classified information audit into USG
agencies & departments especially the Department of
State embassies and consulates, Clinton Foundation
executives, employees and donors computers and
devices and other HRC staffer’s computers and
devices.
- HRC, HRC’s staffers and DNC
prolonged giving information (evidence) to the FBI
or House investigating committees
Opening up an obstruction of justice door if
classified information that was bleach bit (emails
sent from Huma to HRC) is found on Huma’s computer
or leads to other computers or devices with such
destroyed bleach bit classified information on it
going to HRC.
- A politically cold and
highly calculated move by HRC, her staffers and the
DNC to run out the clock to win the Presidential
election on November 8th, 2016 so such critical
national security FBI investigative findings would
not be brought forward.
|
|
C) Private Computer Server Illegal - as
soon as HRC had sworn in a Secretary of State the private server
should have been directly moved into her office at foggy bottom then
cleared and secured at the Department Of State technicians, experts
or special matter experts. |
|
D) Unsecured Emails Illegal for classified
information: Confidential, Secret, Top Secret and Special Access
Program |
|
E) Co-mingled emails - State Department
official business was not separated from Family business (Clinton
Foundation) and personal business |
|
|
FBI Investigation – Cannot Force An FBI
Investigation – DNC, HRC and Podesta asking for a quick resolution.
How can they ask for a quick resolution when they procrastinated and
procrastinated to keep information from being disclosed to the FBI
thus far: |
|
- Due Process is needed (Rule
Of Law Must Be Followed)--- not again handcuffing a
National Security Investigation by the FBI for
political expediency purposes. There cannot be a
compressed time schedule to report to the American
public.There was not a “verdict” rendered in July
during the initial part of the investigation.
Therefore, there is no statute of limitations. AG
Loretta Lynch deferred to FBI Director Comey not to
prosecute so the door was left wide open to report
back to Congress on any new matters which merited an
investigation.
|
|
- Analyze every one of the
600,000 plus emails track back and forth where the
emails went and to what national security activity
violations existed around it or any pay to play
activity revolved around any business activity by
Bill & Hillary Clinton.
- FBI investigators need to
see who the source agency is:CIA, White House, DoD,
DNI, DHS as well as within the Department of State
-- the Diplomatic Services at the 250 Posts in 180
countries with about 5,000 employees Embassies and
Consulates - what type of information was being
forward to HRC one way, back and forth, what the
information initially indicated and what was
redacted.
|
|
|
FBI Investigation – Cannot Force
An FBI Investigation –> |
- FBI investigators need to
further analyze not only where information came from
and was forwarded back and forth but who else
received the same emails between HRC, Jake Sullivan,
Cheryl Mills, Paul Combetta, Brian Pagliano, John
Bentel, Heather Samuelson, Monica Hanley, Huma
Abedin – and where else is this information being
kept, but not disclosed.
|
|
- Once FBI investigators
start finding out national security violations or
criminal activity existed in various parts of the
government and Clinton Foundation more critical
information will be forthcoming as individuals will
not want to spend time in jail.
- Last Monday November 1
release by Judicial Watch: Now members of the Secret
Service who were stationed to guard Hillary and Bill
Clinton will also have to be interviewed for
testimony in the new FBI investigation.
|
|
- (Washington, DC) November 1
Freedom Information Act– Judicial Watch today
released new State Department documents detailing
repeated efforts to hack into the unsecure non-state.gov
email system used by former Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton in November 2010. The hacks are
detailed in email exchanges between State Department
IT official Brian Pagliano and Bill Clinton aide
Justin Cooper. The emails show the system was hacked
10 times in two days from November 27 to 29 2010.
|
|
- The documents also reveal
that Pagliano warned Cooper that because of an
outside service vendor relied upon by the Clinton
system, “we’d be susceptible to such an attack.”
Cooper subsequently informed the U.S. Secret Service
of the attempted hacks, providing agents with each
of the ten reports and summaries Pagliano had
provided him.
|
|
- The new documents were
among the nearly 15,000 Clinton emails discovered by
the FBI, and obtained in response to an April 8,
2016, federal court order directing the Department
of State to begin producing materials for Judicial
Watch in response to a September 3, 2015 Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc.
v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-01441)).
The lawsuit was filed after State failed to comply
with an August 5, 2015 FOIA request seeking
information about Bryan Pagliano’s involvement with
Clinton’s email system.
|
|
- The ten emails from
Pagliano alerting Cooper to the apparent hacking
attempt began on the morning of Saturday, November
27, 2010, and continued through Monday, November 29.
Each of the ten alerts contained the same message,
apparently from the cyber security firm Symantec:
“There was a failed logon attempt logged on the
server. To check who it was log onto the server and
double click on the toolbox icon labeled
Failed_Logon_Attempt
|
|
|
|
FBI POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST: House
oversight committee headed by Congressman Jason Chaffetz wants FBI
deputy director Andrew McCabe to recuse himself from the new FBI
investigation. McCabe took over as FBI Deputy Directorship in
February 1, 2016. |
- What is the FBI POSSIBLE
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: FBI Deputy Director McCabe’s
wife, Jill McCabe, ran for office as a democratic
local state senator in 2015 (not a federal seat) in
which she had lost the race where she accepted
donations of $675,000. Jill McCabe accepted monies
for her campaign from close friends of the Clinton’s
and democratic Governor Terry McAuliffe. Democratic
Governor Terry McAuliffe’s PAC gave $475,000. The
Democratic party gave $207,000.
|
|
|
It should be duly noted Chairmam
Chaffetz on November 2, 2016 forwarded a CONFLICT OF INTEREST letter
indicating Andrew McCabe should recuse himself from the new
investigative proceedings. FBI Director James Comey’s letter went
forth to Congress indicating the FBI had reopened the direction into
HRC’s staffer Huma Abedin where 600,000 plus emails were discovered
on her husband’s Anthony Weiner’s computer. |
|
Requests by Chairman Chaffetz to FBI
Director Comey: |
|
• Turn in all documents relating to the
ethics guidance received from the FBI regarding his wife’s campaign |
|
• Give the date he became aware the State
Department was pressuring the FBI to reverse its decision regarding
the classification of one of Clinton’s emails |
|
FBI POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST: House
oversight committee |
|
Requests by Chairman Chaffetz to FBI
Director Comey: |
|
• Provide information on whether he had any
contact with the State Department regarding the classifications of
Clinton’s emails |
|
• Provide the date he first became aware
the FBI had opened an investigation into Clinton’s email server |
|
• Whether he was present for any briefings
while he was associate deputy director |
|
• Whether the personnel office in the
Washington Field Office provided any support to the investigation
prior to his promotion |
It has been indicated
(hearsay) that Deputy Director McCabe thwarted FBI
agents from investigating the Clinton Foundation.
It has been also indicated (hearsay) that close to 100
FBI agents threatened to resign [placed letters of
resignation on Director Comey’s desk) if FBI Director
James Comey did not come forward to open up a new
investigation into HRC. |
|
|
What could be the reason for the FBI
agents uprising: |
|
- Director Comey finding no
evidence to go forward with email – private server
prosecution. AG Loretta Lynch historically makes the
finding to prosecute
- Having FBI agents sign
non-disclosure agreements when interviewing HRC and
HRC’s staff
- FBI agents started to find
mounting evidence in other matters
Director Comey’s very unusual granting of immunity
to 5 individuals: 2 HRC staffers, 2 employees and 1
state department director
- Not pursing the Clinton
Foundation investigation where evidence may have
been forthcoming – possibly thwarted by Deputy
Director McCabe
|
|