-
Lawyers, Biologists & Such
I recently read the following article from the Wall Street
Journal. While it concerns Law Schools, Universities and recent
American Jurisprudence; I found it to be a perfect example of
what happened to Universities, Bureaucracies, Professionalism,
and Public Policy in the fields of Forest, Range and Wildlife
Management following the passage and implementation of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Act in 1972.
UCLA law professor Stephen Bainbridge, the author of the WSJ
article does an admirable job (often with tongue-in-cheek) of
showing how “diversity” mandates emanating from the 1972 EEO
Act and subsequent race and sex-preferential legislation and
regulations have distorted Law Schools, Lawyers, and American
Jurisprudence. Since most politicians are lawyers and one
federal Branch of government (Judicial) is totally made up of
lawyers and another (Congressional) has always been and remains
controlled by a significant super-majority of lawyers this is no
insignificant matter. Preferences have had and continue to have
profound effects on USA society from top to bottom. It is some
of the debilitating effects of this 1972 Act that I watched
arise in the field of renewable natural resource management and
policies that concern us here.
1972 was
a particularly relevant year when we examine the 180 degree
reversal in national Forest, Range and Wildlife policies, laws,
education and “science” over the past 50 years. So what, you
may ask, makes 1972 and the EEO Act relevant to the
current bias and discrimination in Lawyers and Law Schools
described in the article below and the current continuing chaos
in the national management and non-management of renewable
natural resources, and the accompanying decline in rural
American society? The answer is, “lots” and here is why.
The late 1960’s saw the election of President Nixon (1968) over
Hubert Humphrey based in large measure on getting us out of
Vietnam. It was a chaotic period with anti-war protests, “free”
“love” and widespread drug use plus a clamor for “environmental”
things like “endangered species” and “wilderness” (The
Wilderness Act was passed in 1964) as some sort of retreat from
and purification of what many thought was a grim world. Nixon
stressed an emphasis on environmental matters and with the help
of bipartisan Congressional support passed several significant
new “environmental” laws like the National Environmental Policy
Act and Clean Air Act in 1970. Just before the 1972 election, a
Migratory Bird Treaty with Japan was announced that took more US
bird species out from state jurisdiction and placed them under
federal jurisdiction in addition to a UN “Convention Concerning
the Protection of the World Cultural and National Heritage”.
1972 saw
Nixon’s landslide re-election over Mc Govern in addition to the
passage of the EEO Act. Nixon’s Impeachment scandal over
Watergate and his resignation consumed his two and only years as
a re-elected President. During those two years Vice President
Agnew resigned and Congressman Gerald Ford became Vice President
in 1973. Increasingly federal politicians and federal
bureaucrats began to take note of the popularity of the new
environmental laws. Nouveau “environmental”/”animal rights”
organizations began to appear, often with rich and powerful
donor/backers. Both civilians with all sorts of dreams about
changing things, and government worthies were taking note of how
much “good will” and “support” (i.e. funding, votes, popularity,
etc.) the Wilderness Act, Clean Air Act and NEPA were
generating. Despite the turmoil in Washington in 1972, the US
announced a UN Agreement titled “Declarations of the United
Nations Conference on the Human Environment”. In 1973 a UN
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Fauna and Flora was signed to great cheers as politicians in
Washington were either smelling blood in the water or plotting
what to do in the next election. Simultaneously, EEO
regulations and bureaucracy began to take form.
1975 and 1976 witnessed President Ford struggling to be elected
as President in his own right after Nixon resigned. Surprise,
surprise new environmental/animal laws new bureaucracies and
funding galore were the watchword of the day. Politicians were
stumbling over each other to “pass” “their” bill to save (insert
your favorite critter here). Democrats kept upping the ante
about which Party “cared” more in every proposal and this kept
up until and after President Jimmy Carter succeeded Gerald
Ford. Federal staff personnel from all over Washington were
surreptitiously “visiting” Congressional office to (ssshhh) help
write legislation that meant more employees, more funding, more
high grades, and bigger retirements. Like German U-Boaters
called 1942 “The Happy Times” off the Eastern US Coast when
targets and U- Boat invincibility appeared unlimited; there is
probably a similar euphemism lingering in Washington’s
bureaucratic hallways for those days in the mid 1970’s when
bureaucratic careers and remuneration appeared and were, for a
while, unlimited. The following list give you some idea of the
enormous “you-scratch-my-back/ I’ll-scratch-yours” promise
federal politicians and bureaucrats made to all the burgeoning
Non-Government Organizations for their donations, votes and
funding support:
- 1976
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
- 1976
Animal Welfare Act
- 1976
Coastal Zone Management Act
- 1976
Endangered Species Act
- 1976
Airborne Hunting Act
- 1976
Preservation of American Antiquities Act
- 1976
Estuarine Areas Act
- 1976
Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Act
- 1976
Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act
- 1976
Federal Land Policy and Management Act
- 1976
Fishery Conservation and Management Act
- 1976
Forest Service Organic Administration Act
- 1976
Fur Seal Act
- 1976
Intervention on the High Seas Act
- 1976
Lacey Act Amendments
- 1976
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act
- 1976
Marine Mammal Protection Act
- 1976
Migratory Bird Conservation Act
- 1976
Mineral Leasing Act
- 1976
Mineral Leasing Act for Private Lands
- 1976
Multiple Use – Sustained Yield Act of 1960 Amendments
- 1976
NEPA Amendments
- 1976
National Park Service Act
- 1976
National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act
- 1976
North Pacific Halibut Act
- 1976
Outer Continental Shelf Act of 1953 Amendments
- 1976
Plant Pest Act
- 1976
Plant Quarantine Act
- 1976
Refuge Recreation Act
- 1976
Refuge Revenue Sharing Act
- 1976
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
- 1976
River and Harbor Act of 1899 Amendments
- 1976
Sikes Act Extension
- 1976
Sockeye Salmon and Pink Salmon Fishing Act
- 1976
Submerged Lands Act
- 1976
Taylor Grazing Act Amendments
- 1976
Tuna Convention Act of 1950 Amendments
- 1976
Water Bank Act of 1970 Amendments
- 1976
Wetlands Loan Act of 1961 Amendments
- 1976
Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act
- 1976
Wilderness Act Amendments
1976
A Treaty/Convention Concerning Migratory Birds with Russia that
took more US bird species from state authority and placed them
under federal jurisdiction.
WARNING – If
you are a modern snowflake in need of a “safe place”, read no
further. If you are someone quick to call others a racist or
sexist, please go no further. I claim no animus toward
“government-designated minorities” nor to females. While
everyone “knows” “they all say that, I can only point to a
marriage of 50 years to a wonderful woman and two super
daughters regarding my attitude toward females, plus many
“government-designated minority” friends and associates in
schools, the military, at work and on sports teams over more
years than I can count knowing that they make no difference to
many I am about to offend. Beware, I am about partially blame
EEO for the effects Professor Bainbridge notes in Lawyers, Law
Schools and Laws resulting from EEO regulations, policies and
practices and how that mimics what it also did to American
Forest, Range and Wildlife Management and their associated
entities and effects.
A.
EEO was
implemented by mandating and rewarding with large and increased
bonuses the “hiring, transfer and promotion of women and
minorities”. Minorities did not include Chinese or
Australians. Minority meant black or appearing black or calling
yourself “black” and black was never narrowly defined.
Discriminating against any “woman” or (government-designated)
minority was punishable with all manner of penalties up to and
including jail and fines. During the first three decades (1970,
’80 & ’90) any white male in federal service accused of
discrimination or of making a “pass” at a woman considered
“under” him had all the chances of being exonerated as a
Japanese court gives anyone brought before it. (I just read this
morning that Mr. Ghosn spent $20 million dollars to flee Japan
to Lebanon because of Japan’s 99.5% court conviction
rate.)
By 1975 all the natural resource agencies (Fish and Wildlife,
Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Park Service et al)
heard loud and clear complaints from hiring officials unable to
find “academically-qualified” (hrs. of classes, degrees, veteran
preference. etc.) applicants and similarly it was “impossible”
to transfer or promote employed women or minorities because of
all the internal’ agency requirements (Regional experience,
cross-Divisional jobs, Washington experience, etc.) for any job
of any importance. So, by 1980 all those requirements that
weren’t eliminated (“why is that there?” “that’s not necessary”,
etc.) were so watered down that a Bachelor or Associate degree
in political science or sociology from a Community College was
equal to a Masters in Waterfowl or a Doctorate in salmon
fisheries for hiring, promotion or transfer purposes. The same
thing was happening in USFS, BLM, and other resource agencies.
NOTE - Some agencies took decades to be brought to heel. The
General Accounting Office (GAO) was formerly a place of
CPA-Certified Accountants. The conducted Audits of Government
Spending for Congress and were greatly feared by bureaucracies
for decades. They struggled through the 1980’s and ‘90’s to
find, train and employ Accountants to no avail. I was involved
in two GAO Audits in the 1990’s and one was done by a young lady
that knew less than I did about auditing because I had taken an
Accounting Class by correspondence about 8 years before. In
1998 I worked with real Accountants from GAO to document the
theft of $45 to 60 Million from state wildlife Excise Taxes by
federal employees to introduce wolves into the West; something
Congress had refused to authorize or fund. I believe it was
2005 when I heard quietly that GAO had been renamed and now
meant General “Accountability” Office and that their products
had become “Accountability” Reports.
So, women and minorities filled most responsible positions,
hired more and more people like themselves, were “bullet proof”
toward anyone daring to anger them, and all this was duly noted
by the aging white males concerned with holding their own
career, marrying off daughters, paying college bills and lasting
to retirement.
B.
Consider how this evolving preference-driven federal workforce
coincided with and took advantage of all those “new” federal
laws of the 70’s. Set aside any mention of race or sex and
imagine a federal resource workforce that is either totally
ignorant of the duties and responsibilities of their job (i.e.
GAO “Accountability” authors) or employees deeply opposed to the
job (animal rights advocates, environmental extremists, imagine
a Defense Department staffed largely by Quakers, etc.)
Universities that formerly taught resource management saw what
was happening so they “re-oriented” themselves and all manner of
“environmental” degrees were ginned up where management was
anathema and “natural” and “human-free” were the catchwords.
Scientific rigor and honesty went out the window, the
Universities asked what answer you wanted in order to get the
grant. Faculties were corrupted and more and more unreal
agendas were put into play to stop a pipeline or justify
condemning private property for government takeover. Dangerous
and Deadly predators were painted as cuddly things necessary for
a “balanced” and “healthy” “ecosystem”. Hunting and guns were
no longer needed. Grazing and logging, like hunting and
trapping were to be outlawed along with fur, wood, meat and
rural society. Catastrophic fires were due to climate change
and the only answer was for the rest of us to return to caves
and eat berries (in season).
All these things were and are preambles to the Socialist/Leftist
agendas we now see in Universities and Law Schools where gun
control is demanded despite the 2nd Amendment. Where religion,
free speech, the right to assemble or for a free press are all
being rejected despite the 1st Amendment.
Where secret warrants from secret courts are used to spy on
political opponents despite the 4th Amendment.
The return of double jeopardy and denying even the President of
the United States the right to a speedy trial and due process
and the taking of private property without compensation for no
“public” Use are all around us and have become common despite
the 5th Amendment.
As with the resource agencies, the Law Schools housed in
preference-first Universities, evolved largely as a result of
not “women and minorities” but by
women/minority/white/male/socialists/progressives of the 60’s
and 70’s that by means of EEO and political influence “took
over” the staffs at the University, the Law School, the Natural
Resource Management Departments, The American Bar Association
(that is also Leftist like the American Medical Association and
the American Psychological Association), and the Fish and
Wildlife Service, Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and
Park Service; and cleared them like communists cleared Eastern
European and Chinese populations of anyone “not on board”. Is
it any wonder that a conservative President with a conservative
agenda is having such an uphill fight to do what he promised the
voters he would do for them?
Today’s laws, lawyering and bureaucracies are not what your
folks or grandparents once knew.
C.
Human Nature being what it is, put yourself in the shoes of
these vastly “preferred” “women and minority” employees. Most
of us do not want to think we aren’t “qualified” or that we are
only where we are at because we were given breaks denied others.
By the time that all the EEO mandates were forming tsunamis,
along comes the 1976 onslaught of every cockamamie political
pandering scheme since Rube Goldberg and PT Barnum was enacted
and regulations and policies were being set in concrete. Dozens
of newly-rich NGO’s swarmed to take political advantage by
getting fellow travelers “hired, promoted and transferred”.
This, in turn, steered all the new legislation (and future
amendment opportunities) to wreck hunting on refuges, logging on
National Forests, grazing and mining on BLM lands, etc. Control
of grants to states brought them to heel as federal bureaucrats
took over more and more authority. Waterfowl refuges bought
with Duck Stamp funds were quietly managed to be “natural areas”
with no waterfowl food or water management as mandated in their
authorizing legislation. The waterfowl organizations, like
state agencies and Universities no longer opposed either the
public or private lawlessness condoned by lawyers and
perpetrated by feckless bureaucrats that masqueraded as wildlife
or forest or grassland advocates while quietly turning such
lands into inaccessible fire pits to feed what have become
perpetual catastrophic fire fuel producers full of predators and
danger.
You see this is how these new lawyers, professors, bureaucrats
and “conservation” organizations justify their preferences and
entitlement. They were hired to bring this “new” agenda
forward. All those old, white, males with their antique degrees
were making such a mess of things that we (actually “I”) deserve
to be in charge and anything we (“I”)want to do is protected
from any accountability or even anything that even makes me
“uncomfortable”. It is right and good that people like us
(“me”) are above the law and in charge of these agencies or this
Law School and the quicker we get rid of that 5% that are still
employed in our (“my”) turf, the better.
Take that Professor Bainbridge and Jim Beers!
Jim Beers
7 January 2020
If you found this
worthwhile, please share it with others. Thanks.
You can receive future articles by sending a request with your
e-mail address to: jimbeers7@comcast.net
Fires, Birds & Government
I just
read the mildly amusing article below about the latest hypocrisy
from the “smart” people about climate change and why our only
rights should be what they allow, or the world will explode.
What
caught my eye and the reason I am forwarding this is the four
links in the middle of the article (Marked
with an *) concerning
all the corruption and faux science employed by crooked
bureaucrats and politicians in Europe and North America to
subsidize and justify the construction and expansion of wind
turbine fields that are killing and have killed (as I have said
for years) billions of migrating birds and bats.
As you
consider this cover-up by governments, the media, and “science”
read and watch the current “stories” from Australia that
billions of animals have been killed by the catastrophic fires
and that 183 Australians have been arrested for “starting”
fires.
The
Australian fire “starters” and climate change “deniers”
worldwide have much in common. They are both scapegoats for
government laws and policies that create these massive problems
(catastrophic fires, plummeting bird and bat populations, and
eventually species).
Catastrophic fires are
first and foremost a product of excessive fire fuel
accumulation. Control the available fuel and you have gone a
long way in preventing and stopping “catastrophic” fires. In
Europe, North America and Australia governments have
increasingly, on both government and private land, prohibited
burning, logging and grazing – i.e. management of fire fuel – to
coddle their environmental “partners” and supporters with their
modern urban fantasies from climate change to their distorted
visions of the “ecosystem”. Thus when the fires begin and
common sense rural residents and landowners see the threat of
fires to themselves, they defy the absurd government mandates
and try to quickly burn the fuel that has accumulated near and
around their residences and property, For this it is inferred
that they are match-happy arsonists that should be barred from
human society when they are merely the latest common-sense rural
demographics to be persecuted by dystopian urban leaders and
their underlings. Thus are we told the fires are due mainly to
fire “starters” and (drum-roll please) Climate Change!
Plummeting migratory bird and bat populations in
the last three decades are primarily due to strategically (based
on prevailing wind currents) placed wind turbine farms that
coincide with the migratory bird flyways used for millennia and
the soaring/hunting airspaces used by eagles, hawks and bats et
al. The US Fish and Wildlife Service has had primary
jurisdiction over the migratory birds since 1917 with eagles,
hawks and owls added opportunistically to that authority by
subsequent Treaties and legislation. Bats were always under
State authority until they began disappearing and US Fish and
Wildlife Service began “Listing” them by species. Think, at this
point, about how current Presidential candidates are falling
over each other about how good it will be to shut down all
fossil fuel energy and put “millions” (their word, not mine) out
of work to one day go to work for subsidized wind turbine and
solar mirror quasi-government “companies”. Do you remember
USFWS fighting to minimize or prevent bird mortality due to
government-subsidized wind turbines? Me neither. Do you
remember the “environmental” Universities and professors going
to the mat about bird deaths and other wind turbine effects on
birds and bats? Me neither. Do you remember the media or all
the (send-us-your-money) Bird Non-Government Organizations
fighting the USFWS and Universities about protecting birds and
bats from wind turbines? Me neither. No, all we are told when
Christmas Bird Counts repeatedly find fewer birds and we are
buying more mosquito repellent that it is all “due to habitat
loss” and (drum-roll please) Climate Change.
Bird and
bat population declines, like catastrophic fires, are caused by
self-serving government (politicians and bureaucrats) in cahoots
with self-serving NGO’s, the media and Universities. They sell
us story after story about why these things are happening with
the accompanying audacity that only more laws and more funding
and more government employees and more government
owned/controlled land etc. are the answer!
For
instance:
-
When moose declined in Minnesota as government-protected
wolves (endangered/threatened??) increased and moose hunting
was no longer possible; we were told it was not due to wolf
predation but to ”unknown diseases”, “inadequate research”
and (drum-roll please) Climate Change.
-
While USFWS was charged with and paid to prevent the
importation of “Injurious” Wildlife they failed to stop the
importation of snakehead fish and Asian carp that have
ruined thousands of square miles of US rivers and lakes and
are currently, in an effort doomed to failure, spending
millions to keep these fish out of the Great Lakes. Send
more money and more employees, please.
New Wave
environmental/animal rights federal resource agency managers and
employees are currently hard at work closing all federal lands
to forest management, range management, wildlife management and
generally clearing rural America somewhat like the English Land
Clearances in Ireland and Scotland centuries ago that still
linger in the memories of residents of those lands and their
relatives since spread around the world. How ironic that those
poor people knew, saw and recognized what was going on and for
what reason as everything was taken from them. Yet we moderns
with our computers, college-for-all, and instant communications
face the same sort of tyrants burbling political lies,
bureaucratic “processes”, faux “science, and TV “Documentaries’
sell us these childish tales and we believe them, hoping they
will deliver us. Then as fires come over the horizon and birds
and bats disappear, like baboons faced with a deadly threat, we
cover our face with our hands and meekly wait for the deadly
blow hoping for one more second of freedom and happiness.
Jim Beers
9 January
2020
Do we really face a climate cat–astrophe?
Must we put up with yet another eco-cataclysm fabricated and
exaggerated by ruling elites?
Duggan Flanakin
One day I will write a book: 111,111 ways our saviors have
proposed to save the planet from the coming climate-driven
catastrophes and extinctions. Meanwhile, here’s one you may not
have considered.
At my cat-loving daughter’s house the other day, I ran across
one of her books – How
to Tell If Your Cat Is Plotting to Kill You (by
Matthew Inman).
A little later, I saw this headline: “Hollywood
Celeb Emma Thompson: Eat your pets to survive ‘climate crisis.’”
My first thought? “Emma must have read this book!” But I read
the article and did other research. It turns out that Ms.
Thompson has repeatedly warned the world that the supposed
climate crisis means we must expect “crop failures, water
contamination, damaged houses, and ruined lives.” She now says
we may even have to eat
our own pets in
order to survive the coming climate apocalypse.
That means it’s not just a crisis. It’s turning into a bona fide
cat-astrophe! A furr-ocious cat-aclysm rooted more in dog-ma
than in science or actual weather and climate evidence! But a
rallying cry nonetheless.
Despite what
Ricky Gervais said at
this year’s Golden Globe ceremonies about Hollywood types being
“in no position to lecture the public about anything,” Emma
certainly thinks she knows what she’s talking about. She has won
two Oscars! And two Golden Globes! And in 2018 Queen Elizabeth
named her a Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire!
So she is now officially Dame Emma.
Moreover, as of December 2019, she even has an award named after
her, though perhaps not one she will brag about. In its
inaugural competition, the London-based climate policy NGO, the
Global Warming Policy Forum (www.TheGWPF.com),
announced that it is naming its annual World’s Greatest Climate
Hypocrite Awards “The Emmas,” after Dame Emma.
Noting how
she had flown first class across
the Atlantic to attend a climate protest in London, then jetted
back the same way, champagne glass in hand, GWPF director Dr.
Benny Peiser said her “shamelessness” and “lack of
self-awareness” have “propelled her to the very top of the
field. There are brass-necked business people and sanctimonious
politicians aplenty, but none can match our Emma; she really is
a worthy first winner of our prestigious new award.”
Former President Barack Obama won the eco-hypocrite prize in the
Politician category, while Richard Branson took home the
Business class laurels. But at least Dame Emma flew commercial.
Leo DiCaprio is notorious for taking private jets and limousines
to lecture us lesser mortals about how we must reduce our living
standards to save the planet, while former VP Al Gore prefers
private jets and SUVs to do so.
But don’t get your dander up about Emma. Turns out she is rather
late to the game.
Back in 2017, the online journal PLoS
ONE published
a report on research by UCLA scientist Gregory S. Okin: “Environmental
impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats.”
In the
USA alone, Okin asserted, 163 million dogs and cats have
a hugely detrimental impact on the environment, from the food
they consume to the waste they produce.
Okin found that US dogs and cats “consume as much dietary energy
as 62 million [human] Americans” – and are
responsible for 25-30%
of the environmental impact of meat consumption in
the USA. If these four-footed friends were a separate country,
Catdoggia would rank fifth globally in meat consumption. Getting
rid of dogs and cats, Okin gushes, would be “the environmental
equivalent of removing 13.6 million cars from the road.”
Some cat
lovers might note that his analysis emphasizes canines and
conclude that the world is once again going to the dogs. The ever-grumpy
Garfield certainly
isn’t happy about that.
*Note the
4 “here” links at the end of these three sentences for an
alarming background and update on what wind turbines and
perfidious bureaucrats and politicians are doing to migratory
birds and bats worldwide.. Jim
Indeed,
back in 2013, utilizing a 3-year U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
funded study,
researchers found that previous estimates that cats kill
hundreds of millions of birds a year were very low. Cats
actually kill between 1.4
billion and 3.7 billion birds annually, they
reported,
plus between 6.9
billion and 20.7 billion mammals – mainly mice, shrews, rabbits
and voles. Not even wind turbines wipe out that many birds (and
bats) annually: see here, here, here and here.
Then there
is top New Zealand economist and self-styled environmentalist
Gareth Morgan, who created a foundation to
promote his cat-killing ideas. Morgan demanded that New Zealand
register and neuter all cats, raise the bar for
“allowing” cat ownership, encourage citizens to cage-trap loose
cats and turn them over to local authorities, euthanize all
unregistered cats, fine all registered owners (!), and require
that those same local authorities “dispose” of cats for free.
It’s been
reported that Morgan is the local hero of the New Zealand Mouse
and Rat Protective Society. But even Morgan is a piker.
Writing in
the German leftist Neues
Deutschland (New
Germany),
Katharina Schwirkus argued that, “In addition to their
disgusting excretions, pets are also bad for the climate –
because they eat meat and thus contribute to the emission of
carbon dioxide” (and methane, we would add). Schwirkus says the
ecological footprint of an average German cat is as large as
that of a human Egyptian.
“If you
want to do something good for the climate, you shouldn’t buy a
dog or cat,” she insists. “The breeding of four-legged friends
should be stopped in the long term…. [T]he romantic picture of
pets must finally be deconstructed. Children should be made
aware from a young age that it is absolutely selfish to keep a
dog or a cat in a city.” People needing “comfort animals” will
not be happy.
Meanwhile,
according to “ethicist” William Lynn, writing in The
Conversation, in
2015 the Australian government declared a war on feral cats,
with a goal of killing over 2 million felines by 2020 via
shooting, trapping, and “humane” poison. Lynn argued that there
was no scientific basis for the government’s estimate of 20
million feral cats in Australia, nor for killing a tenth of that
alleged number.
He instead argues that individual animals have a moral value,
and that cats are themselves victims of human
ecological errors. Lynn also questions the moral legitimacy of
climate extinctionists who advocate for lethal management, which
he says rests “on the assumption that individuals don’t matter –
but ecosystems do. He concludes by saying “it
is human beings [not cats] who bear direct moral responsibility
for the ongoing loss of biodiversity in our world.”
(If you need some
amusement and a break from the endless asserted and predicted
climate catastrophes ... that don’t involve cats ... check out
this 50
years report, other recap
articles like
this one, the outdated but enlightening and entertaining WarmList,
and the WUWT Climate
Craziness of the Week section.)
It is those same
certain human beings – certainly not cats – who are spreading
irrational fears about human-generated, plant-fertilizing carbon
dioxide somehow, recently replacing the Sun other power natural
forces in driving climate and weather fluctuations. Those
climate crisis proponents insist that any climate and weather
different from what most of Earth and humanity may have
experienced over the last 50-250 years is unprecedented and will
be cataclysmic.
They trumpet and
bemoan the alleged coming climate extinction crisis – and
produce massive volumes of “studies” and scare stories – telling
everyone else what we must do to save the planet,
while they the wannabe ruling elites tour the planet
first class or in private jets, stay in five-star resorts, and
demand that we eliminate just about everything that
brings joy to the world of regular human beings.
Ricky Gervais is
right. They are in no position to lecture us about anything. So
enjoy your cat, dog, steak, car, overseas vacation and whatever
else helps you enjoy your short sojourn on this wonderful
planet.
Duggan Flanakin is Director of Policy Research at the Committee
For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org)