Click to see preamble.


SEPTEMBER 23, 2018



"National Security / Imminent Threats / Peace through Strength / President Trump Delivering on His Word"
with Bruce Moran
Today's shows:

Hour 1  


Bruce Moran - National Security Advisor

Bruce J. Moran is a senior National Security Advisor who focuses on strategic planning for National Security issues. As a consultant, he works with public officials, U.S. Government committees, departments, agencies, think tanks, and corporations. He works on special national security projects and defines clear "hands on" working solutions for Crisis Preparedness and Crisis Readiness scenarios. He has in-depth experience in foreign policy, security operations & Hi-Tech systems (connectivity, interoperability, and interfacing) such as SMART* Fusion protocols and applications. He consults with the U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Commerce, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, House Committee On Foreign Affairs, Joint Economic Committee, Senate/House Committees on Banking/Finance, Senate Permanent Committee On investigations and the Senate Select Committee On Intelligence.

Security Solutions Technology, LLC is a Veteran Owned (and SDVOSB) Company that provides federal government consulting, IT professional services, security assessments, cybersecurity, geospatial, program and life cycle management, change management, logistics, and financial consulting. We provide a performance and results-based culture in any organization.

Chuck Floyd - Chief Executive Officer

Bruce J. Moran -  Senior National Security Advisor 

Security Solutions Technology

National Security Update 09/19/2018 



Crisis Readiness / Crisis Preparedness Report   


National Security





The President of the United States as Commander & Chief must dutifully deal with current and future (U.S. Space Force) imminent threats. He must provide a sound basis for Crisis Readiness/Crisis Readiness for the Armed Services and the Intelligence community to protect and defend against Enemies Of The State.


Quite importantly, President Trump, as Commander & Chief, has transformed the foreign policy strategic dynamic. President Trump’s foreign policy initiatives fluidly worked within the four critical ever pressing sectors which immediately required:  Military, Intelligence, Diplomatic and Economic support, interventions, sanctions, et al.


During President Trump’s short 1 3/4 year tenor as Commander & Chief, he and his able bodied cabinet have:


·      Eliminated the ISIS Caliphate State murderous terrorist stronghold/network in Iraq (Northern Iraq – Mosul 12/12/17)  as well as directly supported efforts to eliminate ISIS Caliphate State Raqqa stronghold (Syria headquarters). U.S. now pushes to end the Caliphate State In Syria (09/12/18). Some 1,500 – 2,500 battle seasoned ISIS troops remain hidden in the Northeast desert region near Hajin, Syria. About 14,000 ISIS troops still remain in Syria.


·      Acted diligently by sending two strong military Syria airstrike signals to President Putin (Russia) and President Assad (Syria). Not only was President Trump’s definitive actions in relation to the vast crippling and devastating Syria civil war (7 years) but the second primary targeted mission was to stop the dispersal of chemical agents (Douma, Syria chemical attack 04/07/18) where coalition forces (United States, France & Britain April 14, 2018) launched approximately 105 highly precisioned* cruise missiles targeting chemical weapon storage facilities (22 missiles), manufacture/production/research centers (76 missiles) and bunker sites (7 missiles) from multiple strategic positions in the Mediterranean Sea.



site search by freefind advanced


Coalition launched 105 weapons against Syria, with none intercepted, DoD says

On Saturday morning, Pentagon officials gave details on air strikes on Syrian chemical weapons sites launched Friday by the United States, United Kingdom and France.


     Responded judiciously to the innumerable human rights (Genocide – Christian, Yezidi, Turkoman and Shabat) violations which existed in Syria/Iraq.  Cut off Department Of State (DOS) Middle East funding to United Nations earmarking such funds to USAID DOS to go directly to the people of Northern Iraq (Nineveh Plain Region) - the largest refugee crises in our time.

UNHCR - Syria conflict at 5 years: the biggest refugee and ...

As Syria's war reaches another grim milestone today, refugees fleeing the 5-year conflict face greater hurdles to finding safety while international solidarity


Fittingly addressed NATO paying their fair share (July 2018 Brussels) for the defense budget (campaign promise). Directly met with NATO leaders to discuss the security of Europe, Russian intrusion, and the funding for the upgrading protective services which including commitments of U.S. personnel and weapons systems.

Trump 'making an impact' on NATO as allies ramp up defense spending: Ambassador Kay Bailey Hutchison

President Trump has already made a major impact in getting NATO allies to spend more on their own defense, US NATO ambassador Kay Bailey Hutchison told Fox News Sunday.


  Moved directly to stop the aggressive expansion of ISIS –Khorasan in Afghanistan (04/13/17) striking the hidden cave complex (killing 36 terrorists) on the border of Pakistan with a GBU-13 Massive Ordinance Air Blast [MOAB 22,000 lb. bomb aka Mother-Of-All-Bombs]. MOAB is the largest non-nuclear bomb in the U.S. arsenal –“the right weapon, the right target, the right desired effect against ISIS.”*
·      Opened doors to have the first denuclearization talks (Singapore Summit) ever with North Korean President Kim Jon Un (06/12/18): Historical Precedent:
President Kim Jon Un destroys a North Korean nuclear weapons test site (05/24/18) – Good Faith Effort.
President Kim Jon Un releases three (3) American hostages – Good Faith Effort.
President Kim Jon Un returns remains of 200 U.S. soldiers who died in the Korean War  (1950-1953) – O6/21/18 - Good Faith Effort:

President Trump Says North Korea Has Returned the Remains of 200 U.S. Soldiers

Kim Jong Un agreed to return the remains following the Singapore summit


President Kim Jon Un reaffirms denuclearization during President Trump’s term. 09/06/18


President Kim Jon Un and his generals saw the greater importance of meeting with President Trump who made it clear that the United States would not back down to any country (enemy-of-the-state) as the U.S. military had acted with the MOAB bomb in Afghanistan (04/13/17) and one major coalition tomahawk airstrike in Syria (04/14/18).  It was clear President Kim and his generals could no longer feel protected in the North Korean bunkers, tunnels or caves nor feel their missile airstrike capability was anywhere on par with that of the U.S. military massive multi-staged land/air/sea attack highly precisioned missile capability.   It was practical and sound for President Kim to sit down to start denuclearization talk efforts with President Trump. With Major Kudos also going out to the superb work of DoD General Mattis and SOS Pompeo in bringing this all together in highly refined strategic military operations with proper and fitting critical diplomatic negotiations; and along with many kudos for Ambassador Nikki Haley standing firm and strong at the United Nations Security Council.


Special mention for Jim Carafano’s (Heritage Foundation) excellent work and insights on North Korea:

Jim Carafano, The New York Times, “Trump’s Meeting With Kim Jong-un Is Another Pledge to Do What Nobody Else Can”

Jim Carafano, Politico, “Trump meeting with Kim could signal major thaw in nuclear standoff”


President Trump To Chair U.N. Security Council Meeting On Iran (Iran leaders are welcome to attend (if they so choose) – September 2018) TOPIC: Violations of International Law – destabilizing activities - supporting terrorism in Lebanon, Syria & Yemen)

Trump to chair UN Security Council meeting on Iran - CBS News

The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations says President Donald Trump will chair a Security Council meeting on Iran during the annual gathering of world leaders in New York this month. Ambassador ...




“The Obama administration granted citizenship to 2,500 Iranians, including family members of government officials”… “Hojjat al-Islam Mojtaba Zolnour, who is chairman of Iran’s parliamentary nuclear committee and a member of its national security and foreign affairs committee, “…”claimed it was done as a favor to senior Iranian officials linked to President Hassan Rouhani, and he alleged the move sparked a competition among Iranian officials over whose children would benefit from the scheme.”… In 2015, 13,114 people born in Iran were issued green cards, while 13,298 were issued one in 2016, according to figures from the Department for Homeland Security….”


What we can see is that President Trump’s adept transformational Crisis Readiness - Crisis Preparedness foreign policy has effectively dealt with critical and important National Security matters to counter and stop Enemies Of The State. 





What we can see from President Trump’s decisive actions is that the current National Security Crisis Readiness/Crisis Preparedness Strategical operations as shown above is entirely different in successful impact and larger effects than the previous administration's dealing with foreign policy matters.  As Commander-In-Chief, President Trump has made sound and practical determinations in how National Security is to be protected and defended against Enemies of the State. Former CIA Director John Brennan indicated President Trump as being An Enemy Of The Stateand President Trump's acts treasonous.  John Brennan has stepped beyond the cloak of secrecy, trust and privilege, to politically weaponize his former clandestine leadership position and get paid for his publicly biased unsubstantiated (unfounded) hyperbolic opinions as a network commentator. It is unprecedented to have a former CIA Director to act in such an unprofessional and zany/wacky manner.





CHRISTOPHER STEELE: Foreign British Spy MI-6 -- Russian Specialist


Would Christopher Steele and/or his foreign firm Orbis be considered meddling/interfering in the 2016 United States Presidential election process with his opposition research (dossier)? Is the DNC Opposition Research Dossier an obscure fancy name to cover-up international spying on (and conspiratorial thwarting/obstructing) a U.S. Presidential Candidate/President–Elect Candidate/U.S. President?

The covert intelligence world-wide community is a very highly connected network both known and unknown for plausible deniability purposes. Christopher Steele belonged to this elite British intelligent clandestine MI-6 network.   Christopher Steele used his resources and network to obtain information as well as provide misinformation.  Such sophistry is clearly understood to be part of the espionage multi-dimensional landscape for going undetected.

First important question to be raised with foreign government /intelligence involvement: Did Orbis Intelligence Services ever act as a front for MI- 6 which was run domestically and internationally, in whole or part,  by Christopher Steele and his associates?  Did Orbis have past and current connections to the DNC and/or their respective candidates, donors, et al? The imperceptible links may help connect-the-dots in how this whole situation (scheme) came into existence.  This Orbis network  can be considered the back door to the back door of  Fusion GPS.

Who were Christopher Steele’s contacts which gave him certain information; and what information was fabricated by Christopher Steele?   How does Orbis fit into this whole picture?

Who helped Christopher Steele fabricate the information in the Dossier?  Was it Christopher Steele who acted alone or was Christopher Steele working in concert with others from his British intelligence network (and expanded intelligence resource network), DNC, DNC backers, USG Executive Branch, or unknown rich foreign country source(s)?  Were these groups aligning their efforts to control the power in Washington D.C. and keep such political power centralized in the European Union (most of whose leaders vehemently opposed Brexit as well as did not like President Elect Trump’s NATO position and tariffs)? 

The current Congressional & Department of Justice  investigative “eyes” are on   Fusion GPS – which is the front door.   Where did the Fusion GPS investigative information come from -- the many financed backdoors of Orbis or other unknown entities? Was Christopher Steele the lead guy (Orbis intelligence expert) who later became the fall guy for all the intelligent agents or STONEGHOST networks “Five Eyes” [FIVY] or “Fourteen Eyes” (SIGNET plausible deniability) [See APPENDIX A:  EYES MEMBERS] supporting their collective work, including the Dossier? Was “Five Eyes” or Fourteen Eyes” used in conjunction with the FISA warrants? If so, who directed “Five Eyes” or “Fourteen Eyes” to do proxy cyberactivities; and how broad was their sweep? If not, was “Five Eyes” or “Fourteen Eyes” used as an on-going spying network to support the Obama adminstration’s operations which was simultaneously called upon to reach into the 2016 Presidential campaign?




What about individual liberties, freedoms and rights being trampled upon when spying usurps the U.S. Constitution? That is, how many individuals [U.S. citizens] had been spied upon? Was “Five Eyes” or “Fourteen Eyes” working on the request of an unbeknownst White House third party (circumventing laws which prevent a country spying on its own citizens)?  Was any elected / appointed U.S. official or staff member involved in (called for) the above mentioned SIGNET investigative sweep? [See: APPENDIX B: Obama Administration Using Espionage Act 1917 – abuse of power].  Major questions arise as to what lengths would the Obama administration and its foreign government supporters go to support Hillary Clinton? How was spying used (aside from the dossier) against Hillary Clinton’s presidential opponent President Elect-Donald Trump?



Sen. Mark Udall Calls For CIA Director John Brennan To ...

WASHINGTON -- Following reports that Central Intelligence Agency employees improperly accessed computers used by U.S. Senate staff to investigate the age...


“After being briefed on the CIA Inspector General report today, I have no choice but to call for the resignation of CIA Director John Brennan,” Udall said in a statement. “The CIA unconstitutionally spied on Congress by hacking into Senate Intelligence Committee computers.”

Three major questions arise from CIA Director John Brennan’s spying on Congress: 1) How deep was the penetration of the CIA into Senate Intelligence Committee? 2) How long had the CIA been spying on the Senate Intelligence Committee? 3) Was the CIA spying on any other committees or sub-committees in the U.S. Senate or U.S. House?

Had any CIA tradecraft methods been deployed to spy on President Trump. The White House, the Donald Trump Campaign, Donald Trump Transition Team or RNC [2016-2017] as the CIA had deployed various tradecraft methods to spy on the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee [2014]?


SPECIAL NOTE:  The CIA’s Charter (legal agreement with U.S.G) prevents the CIA from spying [HUMINT & SIGNET] on U.S. citizens within the United States.





As the intelligence community has its own internal network, did former CIA director John Brennan have any ties [hand-offs] to Orbis, Christopher Steele or any other intelligence government covert networks or entities who directly or indirectly worked with Orbis [the clearing house] or any other entities that intersected with any other private / public companies or foreign governments?   


What was the nature of CIA Director’s John Brennan’s trip to Moscow (March 2016) and the hand-off of Dossier information to Senator Harry Reid (08/25/16)?


DOSSIER INFORMATION: How many individuals approved, reviewed, handled, framed or changed certain information in the Dossier before such Dossier information appeared on the FISA Warrant (justification)?    Did anybody from Fusion GPS, the DNC or DNC backers/financiers add, alter or delete information from the Dossier as it then later became part of the FISA court warrant (justification)?   Did any members of the U.S. House or U.S. Senate approve, review, handle, frame, or change certain dossier information which was part of the FBI FISA court warrant (justification)? How many different handlers domestically and internationally approved, reviewed, framed or changed the dossier information before it made its way into the hands of the FBI before it was submitted to the FISA court?






CIA cyber-spying toolkit now in hands of hackers worldwide: WikiLeaks

Four4Four Tech: WikiLeaks CIA dump alleges TV hacking; Jay Z launches venture capital firm, new 'manterruption' app, high-tech temporary tattoos store data


Did nefarious actors or unauthorized USG personnel – (hand-off the Cherry Blossom Project) or utilize the Cherry Blossom project tool kit [Vault 7 means/methods]  during the time of the 2016 Presidential Primary process and the National Presidential Election (before Wikileaks exposed it in 2017 March)?


How does Sir Andrew Wood, MI 6, Christopher Steele, Orbis, CIC (CIA-Frankfort, Germany)), NSA (Dagger Complex Grisham, Germany), CIA Director John Brennan and MI -6 Head Robert Hannigan fit into the mix of leaving a (Cherry Blossom exploit) Russian footprint in the United States? Was it actually a Russian footprint left by a U.S. intelligence agency / proxy cyberactivity GCHQ (MI 6) clandestine request [collusion/obstruction/espionage sophistry –FIVY – U.S. National Security Breach] or actually Russian government hackers intervening/meddling in the United States elections or both? To what extent, and by whom?


NYT: According to the WikiLeaks release, the large number of techniquesallows the C.I.A. to mask the origin of some of its attacks and confuse forensic investigators. (2013-2016)


Was Sir Andrew Wood using the Halifax Security Conference as a means to collaborate efforts or distribute information on the Dossier? So why was Senator McCain handling backdoor operations for the Dossier at the Halifax Security Conference? Why was he (John McCain) in Halifax (Canada) in the first place to accept the dossier and give a speech?

Why wasn't the dossier given directly to the FBI  by Sir Andrew Wood (or others) or the British Government (because it is a problem of meddling/interfering in the Presidential campaign)?  What business was it of John McCain, in the first place, to handle information going into the secret FISA court? What is the British Government doing with the Dossier in the first place? What other officials in the European Union had copies of the dossier (and exploited it)? What other foreign government investigative agencies contributed to the dossier (and exploited it)?  Who had financed the dossier research (big donor, a nation's big purse [treasury], etc)  -- Who at the Halifax 2017 International Security Forum had worked with Christopher Steele (to collect, collaborate and disseminate dossier information)?   

So much for secret dossier information being secret for the FISA court as when everyone and their mother was handling it and feeding the media.

So where we stand today with President Trump’s transformational (Make America Great Again) domestic and foreign policy has a tremendous push-back from long-held (30 years plus same ol’/same ol’) stagnant international political traditions, beliefs, policies and programs, bureaucractic entrapped/entropic systems, geopolitical entrenched forces,  counter-growth economic stove-pipe programs, trade ineffectiveness (trade imbalances) and financial/market institutions (socialism vs. fair trade).

The large continuous push-back is naturally coming from all those stakeholders along with their associated institutions (referred above) who have held power and influence for generations (who do not want to give it up) in their respective countries and at the United Nations, European Union, UNSC, WHO, WTO, et al.  

BOTTOM LINE: Was the continuous and relentless formative foreign and domestic push-back along with the Dossier collection process [part of the insidious sophistry clandestine legal push-back]a collaborative effort: MI-6/ KGB agents,  and other intelligence agents and foreign elected/appointed officials  and special interests who had been highly connected and intertwined to the previous Clinton/Bush/Obama Administrations (24 years)  - Clinton election (4 more years $$$)... all willing (plausible deniability) to contribute all they could to stop Donald Trump (at all costs $$$) to maintain and sustain (not change nor alter) their high-end controlling & dominating powerful world-wide political force . 

Uranium One, Iran, NATO (pay fair share), Brexit,  Trade Policy (fair trade not free trade giving away the shop) – Tarriffs. In simple terms, President Trump (President Elect-Trump - Presidential Candidate Trump) went bigtime against the establishments’ $$$ / Deep State's grain [gravy train] -- foreign and domestic powers that be. 

In conclusion, President Trump changed the whole of the U.S. National Security landscape providing sound and practical Crisis Preparedness/Crisis Readiness programs and policies that appropriately and fittingly dealt with Enemies Of The State that posed Imminent Threats to the United States and its allies.




This information appearing below was first presented in March 2018 by Chuck Floyd and Bruce J. Moran showing that there had been clear signs that the FISA court procedures need to be revamped and National Security (counter-terrorism/espionage) proceedings had been usurped by negligent parties. The entire FISA warrant process must come under heavy scrutiny by Congress, the Supreme Court and the Department of Justice as the apparent failures have occurred by grossly negligent parties  who did not properly handle, submit, review and verify critical information which lays the groundwork for the FISA warrant (justification process – FISA Judge approval).  Checks, counter-checks and cross-checks for proper verification in obtaining a FISA warrant need to be properly and fittingly addressed (verified). National Security is put in jeopardy when the court systems are used in fashions which do not fit the criteria for counter-terrorism and espionage safeguards – fail safe mechanism.


The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 ("FISA" Pub.L. 95–511, 92 Stat. 1783, 50 U.S.C. ch. 36) is a United States federal law which establishes procedures for the physical and electronic surveillance and collection of "foreign intelligence information" between "foreign powers" and "agents of foreign powers" suspected of espionage or terrorism… Depending on the type of surveillance, approved orders or extensions of orders may be active for 90 days, 120 days, or a year.


FISA warrant process (application – collection of information) must be closely investigated. Congressman Trey Gowdy, Senator Charles Grassley, and Senator Lindsey Graham indicate a Special Counsel is in order. What was the rational for the warrant presented to the FISA judges?  Who signed off on the extensions of the FISA warrants every 90 days? What was the rationale for the extensions?




----- Nellie Ohr – Fusion GPS --------



JUDGES NOT TO BLAME – WHAT IS THE FISA JUDGE’S RESPONSIBILITY?   Did inherent problems exists in the evidence presented by the DOJ and FBI to get the FISA warrant:


Dossier = from Fusion GPS was used as evidence to obtain FISA Warrant

Dossier – Paid for by DNC and Hillary Clinton Campaign – not clearly delineated (spelled out) in the FISA warrant 

Perkins Cole law firm for DNC  & Clinton Campaign payed (168k) to Steele for the Dossier – not spelled out in FISA warrant

Dossier – Christopher Steele – MI-6 (Russian Specialist):  credibility

Dossier – Christopher Steele – leaked information to the national media 9/16 (New Yorker, WP, Yahoo News & CNN) that he worked for the FBI (broke cardinal rule) Steele was “suspended then terminated” by the FBI.  Lying to an FBI officer is a felony bringing up to 5 years in prison.

Yahoo article was used as evidence to obtain the FISA Warrant

Dossier – Christopher Steele - Sources not clearly identified by

Christopher Steele in how the information was harvested.








SPECIAL NOTE: The FBI headquarters Deputy Assistant Peter Strotz handled two (2) major concurrent cases directed at Presidential candidates: 1) The Hillary Clinton Email case and 2) The Russian Interference Trump Collusion Case.  He also later joined in June 2017 Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel Investigation.  


IT MUST BE DULY NOTED:  FBI Headquarters (HQ) is there to support the investigations, and each Unit at the FBI Headquarters is part of a Section, so there are (in order of ascension) HQ supervisors, Unit Chiefs, Section Chiefs, Assistant Directors, and the FBI Director James Comey.  The FBI HQ supervisor stays in contact with the field supervisors within his assigned region and area of crime (espionage) and reports to the Unit Chief.  FBI Headquarters personnel DO NOT conduct or direct investigations. Those duties are in the realm of the FBI field offices.   


Most importantly,  traditionally in field offices, each case is assigned to one single case agent who is a field agent, or in some circumstances the case agent and a co-case agent.  The field office squad supervisor then can order other members of the squad to support that investigation, but each agent does have his or her own assigned cases.   


BOTTOM LINE: Why was Peter Strozk, a high ranking Bureau manager, assigned duties to direct any investigation?  Further, for Peter Strotz to be assigned to both key cases is a clear conflict of interest.  So there are two big inherent problems (issues): Why is an FBI headquarters manager directing ANY investigation; and how is it that none of the TOP FBI management  did not see FBI Agent Strotz directing both cases as a clear Conflict of Interest?


--------------------------------END SPECIAL NOTE---------------------------------


Two FBI Agents: Peter Strozk & FBI Lawyer Lisa Page

Lisa Page in closed door testimony acknowledged that there had not been any collusion – why was information not released sooner?  FBI Agent Peter Strozk  proceeded to move on collusion case with Acting Director Andrew McCabe [Director James Comey fired] (knowing  that there had been no evidence of collusion) to create a Special Counsel.

Conspiratorial Nature Of Special Counsel?

(Politically biased? – Politicallly Weaponized the FISA warrant)

Liaison relationship (affair between Storzk & Page):

The Storzk & Page text messages revealed they both:

·      Did not want Hillary Clinton charged

·      Did not want Donald Trump to win


FBI Agent Peter Strozk  & FBI Lawyer Lisa Page friends with FISA Judge Rudolph Contreras (who recused himself). Lisa Page also had an affair (relationship) with FISA judge: Judge Rudolph Contreras


Additional Key Information: FBI Agent Peter Strozk interviewed Michael Flynn in the Russian collusion case.  FBI Agent Peter Strozk was also part of the Hillary Clinton email investigation --- found on Anthony Weiner’s computer (sent by Huma Abedin) – which was addressed right before the November 7, 2016 Presidential elections – emails (Zero-hedge) determined not to be a National Security problem – no probable cause – little or no action.


Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s recommended termination by: 1) the Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horwitz’s internal review and the 2) the FBI’s Office Of Professional Responsibility (OPR) – which was forwarded such detailed information (allegations of misconduct) from Inspector General Horwitz.  McCabe leaked Information (unauthorized disclosure) to the Wall Street Journal regarding an on-going FBI public corruption investigation of the Clinton Foundation.


---Required by Statute (50 U.S.C.) a FISA order (warrant) on an American citizen must be renewed every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause---

Deputy FBI DirectorAndrew McCabe signed off on one FISA warrant.

FBI Director Comey signed off on three FISA warrants.

Acting Attorney General (AAG) Sally Yates, AAG Dana Boente, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein signed off on one or more FISA warrants.



“And most conspicuously, Schiff’s response is silent on one of the most damning allegations from the Nunes memo: That acting FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe told the House Intelligence Committee in December that “no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court) without the Steele dossier information.”

“The FBI also had reason to view his research with skepticism—on grounds of its tabloid-like allegations, and also on the near-fantastical claim of skill that underlay it. To wit, that a man who had been out of official spy rings for seven years was nonetheless able, in a matter of weeks and with just a few calls from London, where he lives, to unravel an international conspiracy that had eluded the CIA, FBI, MI6 and every other Western intelligence agency, all of which have access to the globe’s most sophisticated surveillance tools.”

“But rather than proceed with caution, the FBI swallowed the whole package. According to Sen. Chuck Grassley’s declassified criminal referral, former Director James Comey testified that the bureau couldn’t meaningfully corroborate the dossier, but used it in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court proceedings anyway because Mr. Steele had previously provided “reliable” information.”

Questions: What working relationship did FBI Director Comey have with British Agent Steele? Did previous associations require obtaining FISA warrants?


The Brennan Center Report On FISA (2015):

What Went Wrong With The FISA COURT


Excerpts Brennan Center Report Pages 4-5:

Fundamental changes are needed to fix these [FISA COURT] flaws. Following Snowden’s disclosures, several bills were introduced to try to ensure that the court would hear the other side of the argument, generally from some type of public advocate. Other bills addressed the court’s secrecy by requiring the executive branch to declassify significant opinions or release summaries. These proposals would make important improvements, but they do not address the full range of constitutional deficiencies resulting from the changes in law and technology detailed in this report. The problem with the FISA Court is far broader than a particular procedure or rule. The problem with the FISA Court is FISA.


The Brennan Center report proposes a set of key changes to FISA to help restore the court’s legitimacy.


• Congress should end programmatic surveillance and require the government to obtain judicial approval whenever it seeks to obtain communications or information involving Americans.  This would resolve many constitutional concerns.


• Congress should shore up the Article III soundness of the FISA Court

by ensuring that the interests of those affected by surveillance are represented in court proceedings, increasing transparency, and facilitating the ability of affected individuals to challenge surveillance  programs in regular federal courts.


The  Brennan Center report proposes a set of key changes to FISA to help restore the court’s legitimacy.


• Congress should end programmatic


• Finally, Congress should address additional Fourth Amendment concerns by ensuring that the collection of information under the rubric of “foreign intelligence” actually relates to our national security and does not constitute an end-run around the constitutional standards for criminal investigations.


Under today’s foreign intelligence surveillance system, the government’s ability to collect information about ordinary Americans’ lives has increased exponentially while judicial oversight has been reduced to near-nothingness. Nothing less than a fundamental overhaul of the type proposed here is needed to restore the system to its constitutional moorings.

--------------------END BRENNAN CENTER FISA REPORT-----------------

Final Questions:

·      U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS: How has National Security been compromised or put at risk ? If so, how so?


·      CONSTITUTIONAL MOORINGS: How has the U.S. Constitution been usurped, undermined or circumvented?  Do certain actions create a constitutional crisis?


·      COVERT OPERATIONS: How have covert operations (sources & methods) been sacrificed, exposed or put at risk?  [Loose Lips And Loose USG Cybersecurity (Defensive/Offensive Weapons) Sink Ships)?


·      POLITICAL INTERESTS & NATIONAL SECURITY: How have political interests manipulated or sacrificed National Security?


·      U.S. DEPARTMENTS & AGENCIES – RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABLITY: How have USG departments or agencies over stepped their bounds?


·      U.S. DEPARTMENTS & AGENCIES –  MANDATES: How have USG departments or agencies  fulfilled or not fulfilled their mandates?


·      INFLUENCE OF POLITICAL OR SPECIAL INTERESTS: Have or have not political or special interests held sway over National Security?


·      U.S. DOMESTIC & FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE: Has the U.S. intelligence community suffered because of political and special interests?


·      CONSTITUTIONAL CONCERNS: As the U.S. Supreme Court has jurisdiction over all federal courts (judicial oversight), what role can the Supreme Court play to ensure the U.S. Constitution has been adhered to (not violated) and ensure the FISA judges (robust peer review every 2 years) and the Executive Branch have acted in accord with the U.S. Constitution (Fourth Amendment concerns)?





5 EYES – 9 EYES and 14 EYES (SIGNET)


The Five Eyes are cooperating with various 3rd Party countries in at least two groups:


Five Eyes (United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand)

  • The "Nine Eyes", consisting of the Five Eyes plus Denmark, France, the Netherlands, and Norway.
  • The "Fourteen Eyes", consisting of the same countries as the Nine Eyes plus Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, and Sweden.

Political & Weaponized FISA Warrant:



APPENDIX B: Obama Administration Espionage Act 1917



The Obama administration used the 1917 Espionage Act with unprecedented vigor, prosecuting more people under that law for leaking sensitive information to the public than all previous administrations combined. Obama's Justice Department dug into confidential communications between news organizations and their sources as part of that effort.

In 2013 the Obama administration obtained the records of 20 Associated Press office phone lines and reporters' home and cell phones, seizing them without notice, as part of an investigation into the disclosure of information about a foiled al-Qaida terrorist plot.

AP was not the target of the investigation. But it called the seizure a "massive and unprecedented intrusion" into its news-gathering activities, betraying information about its operations "that the government has no conceivable right to know."

Obama's Justice Department also secretly dogged Fox News journalist James Rosen, getting his phone records, tracking his arrivals and departures at the State Department through his security-badge use, obtaining a search warrant to see his personal emails and naming him as a possible criminal conspirator in the investigation of a news leak.

"The Obama administration," The New York Times editorial boardwrote at the time, "has moved beyond protecting government secrets to threatening fundamental freedoms of the press to gather news."







“CIA is using popular TV’s, smartphones, and cars to spy on its owners.”




QUESTIONS 3: 1)  Did the CIA use the Cherry Blossom Tool Kit or other CIA cybersecurity attack platforms (code)  to spy on the Senate Intelligence Committee?  Did the CIA use Cherry Blossom Tool Kit or other CIA cybersecurity attack platforms (code) to spy on the President Trump Campaign, Trump family, President Trump transition team or the RNC? 3) Did the CIA use Cherry Blossom Tool Kit or other CIA cybersecurity attack platforms (code) to spy on any U.S. elected or appointed officials or their famil