DECEMBER 5, 2021 |
|
 |
|
|
Hour 1 |
"A Round of Golf
with My Father" |
|
With
William Damon |
 |
Hour 2 |
"Wrath - America Enraged" |
|
Peter Wood |
 |
About William Damon
William Damon is
a professor at Stanford University, director of the Stanford Center
on Adolescence, and senior fellow at Stanford University's Hoover
Institution. He is the author of the new book, A
Round of Golf with My Father: The New Psychology of Exploring Your
Past to Make Peace with Your Present.
As William
Damon demonstrates: Viewing our past through the eyes of maturity
can reveal insights that our younger selves could not see. Lessons
that eluded us become apparent. Encounters that once felt like
misfortunes now become understood as valued parts of who we are. We
realize what we’ve learned and what we have to teach. And we’re
encouraged to chart a future that is rich with purpose.
In A Round of Golf with My Father, William Damon introduces
us to the “life review.” This is a process of looking with clarity
and curiosity at the paths we’ve traveled, examining our pasts in a
frank yet positive manner, and using what we’ve learned to write
purposeful next chapters for our lives.
For Damon, that process began by uncovering the mysterious life of
his father, whom he never met and never gave much thought to. What
he discovered surprised him so greatly that he was moved to reassess
the events of his own life, including the choices he made, the
relationships he forged, and the career he pursued.
Early in his life, Damon was led to believe that his father had been
killed in World War II. But the man survived and went on to live a
second life abroad. He married a French ballerina, started a new
family, and forged a significant Foreign Service career. He also
was an excellent golfer, a bittersweet revelation for Damon, who
wishes that his father had been around to teach him the game.
We follow Damon as he struggles to make sense of his father’s
contradictions and how his father, even though living a world apart,
influenced Damon’s own development in crucial ways. In his life
review, Damon uses what he learned about his father to enhance his
own newly emerging self-knowledge.
Readers of this book may come away inspired to conduct informal life
reviews for themselves. By uncovering and assembling the often
overlooked puzzle pieces of their pasts, readers can seek
present-day contentment and look with growing optimism to the years
ahead.
https://spectator.org/why-everyone-could-benefit-from-a-life-review/ |
Why Everyone
Could Benefit From a “Life Review” |
by William Damon |
A “don’t look
back!” approach to life has lots of appeal. We aim for bright
futures. Why not focus all our mental energies on plowing ahead with
vigor? Preoccupations with the past can slow us down.
Future-mindedness, for good reason, is deemed a character strength
for people of all ages.
Yet totally turning away from the past is not the best way to build
a well-directed future. We can’t learn lessons from past mistakes
unless we openly recognize them. We can’t unburden ourselves from
old regrets and resentments unless we confront them. In a positive
sense, our past accomplishments contain rich troves of ideas about
what we’re capable of doing, what’s given us satisfaction, who we’ve
become, and who we can aspire to be in the years to come. This is
what Soren Kierkegaard meant when he wrote, “Life can only be
understood backwards; and then it must be lived forwards.” A
contemporary version of this insight was offered by Steve Jobs at a
Stanford commencement address in 2005: “You can’t connect the dots
looking forward; you can only connect them looking backward. So you
have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future.”
When thinking
about our past, we often recall the high points with nostalgia and
the low points with regret. While these are natural emotional
inclinations, they are not particularly useful because neither
nostalgia nor regret help us with the challenges of coping with the
present and preparing for the future. They may even stop us from
confronting these challenges by disguising what actually happened
and obscuring important lessons we otherwise would have taken to
heart.
In my life, a dramatic phone call from my daughter triggered in me a
burning desire to take a new look at my past and the people that
shaped it. I had grown up without a father, and when I was young I
was led to believe that he was killed during World War II. When I
later found out that he survived the war and abandoned my mother and
me before I was born, I deduced that he was a scoundrel and I wanted
to hear no more about him. But my daughter’s phone call revealed a
different story that, to my surprise, affected me deeply.
My daughter had
taken an interest in her grandfather and discovered that, after
disappearing from my life, my father forged a distinguished Foreign
Service career and established a second family with daughters who
were my unknown half-sisters. He passed away before I heard this,
but he left a trail of records, friends, and relatives that I could
explore for further discoveries. I had never seen a picture of him
or knew anything about what he was like. Now, fired with curiosity,
I found out everything I could. In the process, I gained an
understanding of how he had influenced my own life in ways I never
imagined.
The revelations of my father’s life moved me to conduct a “life
review,” a method of self-analysis developed by the legendary
psychiatrist Robert Butler. A life review involves searching our
memories, interviewing old friends and relatives, and retrieving
school records and archival documents. With it, we can reconstruct
our pasts in a manner that can provide three benefits: 1) acceptance
of the events and choices that shaped our lives, fostering gratitude
for the life we’ve been given, in place of self-doubt, regret, and
resentment; 2) an authentic understanding of who we are and how we
got to be that way, leading to a well-grounded self-identity; and 3)
a clarity in the directions we wish to take our lives, reflecting
what we have learned from what has given our lives meaning in the
past.
By finding the positive in earlier experiences—including experiences
that may have appeared unfortunate at the time—we can affirm the
value of our lives and chart a hopeful path forward. As Butler
wrote: “One’s life does not have to have been a ‘success’ in the
popular sense of the word. People take pride in a feeling of having
done their best … and sometimes from simply having survived against
terrible odds.” Butler believed that life reviews would promote
“intellectual and personal growth, and wisdom” throughout the
lifespan. He noted many psychological benefits, including the
capacity to enjoy pleasures such as humor, love, nature, and
contemplation; and “an acceptance of the life cycle, the universe,
and the generations.” This, of course, is a list of the pillars of
psychological health. |
|
|
|
|
INDEX OF RADIO
SHOWS |
SEARCH |
|
WE THE PEOPLE RADIO |
|
|
|
|
My life review
uncovered a wealth of insights about how I developed my interests,
skills, beliefs, and personal characteristics. One influence I never
realized was that my father attended the same school as I, a fine
independent school mostly unknown to the less-advantaged circles in
which I was raised. This revelation cleared up a question that
always puzzled me: how did I make my way to this exceptional school?
It now became clear that my mother had arranged the necessary
scholarship and urged me to attend because she knew that my father
had gone there decades earlier. With my new awareness, I was able to
see how this choice was pivotal and turned my life in a direction it
may otherwise not have taken. What’s more, as I searched my old
school records, and my father’s, I found other fascinating insights
regarding personal traits he and I shared, including some
longstanding foibles (such as a degree of “stubbornness” that
several of my teachers noted over the years) that I decided I still
had time to correct in myself.
During my life review, I also determined that, because of my
intentional obliviousness to elements of my past, I missed
opportunities to meet my father and his family when I was young. The
review exposed mistakes I made. For example, I avoided the difficult
conversations with my mother that would have clarified the truths
about my father’s life in the years before my mother passed away.
Those years, like all years, are irretrievable. I needed to come to
terms with these regrets. My life review helped with that, too.
I came to wish that I had started my life review earlier. I lived
too long with unresolved feelings about growing up fatherless, with
mistaken notions about how I took the schooling path that led me to
my vocation, and without contact with members of my family who would
have been a great joy to know. The information that my life review
uncovered resolved those feelings, revealing the truth about my
father, correcting my false assumptions about my own developmental
trajectory, and enhancing my present-day family relationships.
There is a paradox at the heart of a life review. The ability to
look forward in a confident, well-directed manner requires looking
back in an intentional and open way. We cannot separate the past,
present, and future like walled-off compartments on a moving train.
As Faulkner said, “The past isn’t dead; it isn’t even past.” To be
fully alive now and in the future, we must realize that our past,
far from being dead, is in many ways a living concern and has many
life-giving lessons to teach us. |
|
"Wrath - America Enraged" |
Peter Wood |
 |
About Peter Wood:
Peter Wood is the president of
the National Association of Scholars and author of the new book,
WRATH: America Enraged, as well as last year’s acclaimed 1620: A
Critical Response to the 1619 Project. A former professor of
anthropology and college provost, he is the author of several books
about American culture, including Diversity: The Invention of a
Concept (2003) and A Bee in the Mouth: Anger in America Now (2007).
Wood is a frequent media guest who has appeared on major radio and
television programs nationwide. He is the editor in chief of the
journal Academic Questions and a widely published essayist. In 2019,
he received the Jeane Kirkpatrick Prize for contributions to
academic freedom. He is based in New York City. |
Wrath America
Enraged
By Peter
W. Wood
|
Washington, DC—Anger now dominates American
politics. It wasn’t always so. “Happy Days Are Here Again” was
FDR’s campaign song in 1932. By contrast, candidate Kamala Harris’s
2020 campaign song was Mary J. Blige’s “Work That” (“Let ’em get mad
/ They gonna hate anyway”). Both the left and right now summon
anger as the main way to motivate their supporters. After the
election, both sides became even more indignant. The left accuses
the right of insurrection. The right accuses the left of fraud.
This is a book about how we got here—about how America changed from
a nation that could be roused to anger but preferred self-control,
to a nation permanently dialed to eleven.
In WRATH: America Enraged (Encounter Books, October 12, 2021), Peter
Wood—president of the National Association of Scholars—analyzes the
new era of political wrath and explains how American culture
beginning in the 1950s made a performance art out of anger; how and
why we brought anger into our music, movies, and personal lives; and
how, having step by step relinquished our old inhibitions around
feeling and expressing anger, we turned anger into a way of wielding
political power. But the “angri-culture,” as he calls it, doesn’t
promise happy days again. It promises revenge…and a crisis that
could destroy our republic. Peter Wood argues that the country
should step back from confrontation and violence and channel its
wrath into ways that “wrest the powers of government back into the
hands of those who love our ordered liberty and hold our founding
principles in high regard.”
Peter Wood contends: “Some wrath, I believe, is justified. The
popular will of Americans has been thwarted by a combination of
careerist elites, progressive ideologues, an unprincipled press, and
a business class more attuned to global opportunities than to
domestic flourishing. Because traditional forms of political
protest have been tourniqueted by mass arrests, censorship, and
decisions by law enforcement and the courts to stand aside, many
Americans see themselves as having been denied a legitimate voice in
their own governance. They are right in that judgment, and it is
the kind of judgment that turns anger into wrath.”
WRATH outlines how the rage of this era is “further prodded by a
progressive elite that seems to take sadistic delight in devising
new ways to torment ordinary Americans…‘Antiracism’ is a psyops
campaign aimed at institutionalizing discrimination against Whites.
The 1619 Project is an attempt to erase American history and put in
its place an elaborately constructed lie in which slavery explains
everything. ‘Critical race theory’ (CRT) further amplifies the
message that American success is built entirely of the bricks and
mortar of White racial supremacy. The elite preaches and now
practices the benefits of abolishing our national border and
flooding the country with illegal immigrants, at the expense of
working-class Americans…Progressives manipulated the Wuhan virus
epidemic by turning a manageable health crisis into a major economic
disaster, an excuse for stripping Americans of their civil
liberties, and an incitement of mass hysteria. And progressives,
claiming the need to protect ‘voter rights,’ seek to lock into place
the subterfuges they used to steal the 2020 presidential election.”
Peter Wood warns, as he previously did in A Bee in the
Mouth, against the consequences of a culture of indulging too freely
in the celebration of anger. He maintains that “the ferocious
political and ideological battles of 2020 and 2021,
I argue, should be seen through the prism of what I call ‘new
anger’: that self-regarding, self-rewarding, flamboyantly
expressive, and narcissistic form of performative rage. New anger
often gets in the way of our better judgment, but that doesn’t mean
that the underlying anger is necessarily foolish. We may be angry
for the right reason but angry in the wrong way.”
Ultimately, WRATH hopes to “inspire confidence in those who are
determined to wrest their nation back from the elites who have taken
it away. Their efforts must overcome the silencing, censorship,
criminalization of dissenting opinion, and other forms of
persecution that are becoming the standard operating procedure of
the illiberal regime now in power. To those who feel angry about
this but who are ridden with doubts about how to contest this new
order, this book offers the counsel that, in some circumstances,
your wrath is your best defense. But wrath is a dangerous weapon,
and you must use it wisely to avoid self-injury.” |
To arrange an interview with Wrath author Peter Wood, please
contact Stephen Manfredi at 202.222.8028
or smanfredi@ManfrediStrategyGroup.com
|
10 Interview Questions
for Wrath Author Peter Wood
To Learn More
About Wrath, visit www.EncounterBooks.com
-
Why did you
write WRATH: America Enraged?
-
How did
anger come to dominate American politics?
-
Why are
Americans on both the political Left and Right so angry
post-election? Is the Right’s anger against Biden different in
any important way from the Left’s anger against Trump? How did
the United States change from a nation that could be roused to
anger but preferred self-control, to a nation permanently
enraged?
-
What is “new
anger” and how does it differ from its older forms? What is the
difference between anger and wrath? In your first chapter you
discuss the “grapes of wrath” and The Battle Hymn of the
Republic—references to the American Civil War. Is America
on the brink of another civil war?
-
In WRATH,
you contend that “Some wrath, I believe, is justified. The
popular will of Americans has been thwarted by a combination of
careerist elites, progressive ideologues, an unprincipled press,
and a business class more attuned to global opportunities than
to domestic flourishing. Because traditional forms of political
protest have been tourniqueted by mass arrests, censorship, and
decisions by law enforcement and the courts to stand aside, many
Americans see themselves as having been denied a legitimate
voice in their own governance.” Please explain.
-
How are
progressive elites stoking rage on a range of issues from
“Antiracism,” Critical Race Theory, and efforts to erase
American history like the 1619 Project to unfettered illegal
immigration, the Covid pandemic response, and new “voter rights”
campaigns?
-
Even if the
anger is justified, what are the risks of losing emotional
self-control and consequences of a culture of indulging too
freely in the celebration of anger? How could the
“angri-culture” actually threaten our republic?
-
How does
“new anger” actually get in the way of our better judgment?
-
WRATH hopes
to “inspire confidence in those who are determined to wrest
their nation back from the elites who have taken it away. Their
efforts must overcome the silencing, censorship, criminalization
of dissenting opinion, and other forms of persecution that are
becoming the standard operating procedure of the illiberal
regime now in power. To those who feel angry about this but who
are ridden with doubts about how to contest this new order, this
book offers the counsel that, in some circumstances, your wrath
is your best defense. But wrath is a dangerous weapon, and you
must use it wisely to avoid self-injury.” How can Americans use
their wrath constructively?
-
What
practical steps could the average citizen take to step back from
confrontation and violence to “wrest the powers of government
back into the hands of those who love our ordered liberty and
hold our founding principles in high regard”? Do you think
peaceful civil disobedience is an effective tool in today’s
climate to counter woke progressivism?
###
|
We want to thank Stephen Manfredi.
He brings us some really amazing guests!!!!
Stephen
Manfredi
Manfredi
Strategy Group, LLC
1478
Kirby Road, Suite 1000
McLean,
Virginia 22101
202.222.8028 mobile
www.ManfrediStrategyGroup.com
|
|
|
|
|
|