AUGUST 14, 2022 |
|
 |
|
|
Hour 1 |
"Pope Francis and Putin’s war against Ukraine" |
About Francis Rooney
Francis
Rooney served as United States
Ambassador to the Holy See under George
W. Bush from 2005–2008. He is Chief
Executive Officer of Rooney Holdings,
Inc.
In his new book, THE GLOBAL VATICAN,
Ambassador Rooney provides an
unprecedented inside look at the
Catholic Church, its role in world
politics and diplomacy, and the
extraordinary relationship between the
United States and the Holy See.
Ambassador Rooney serves as a member of
the Advisory Board of the Panama Canal
Authority, a member of the Council of
American Ambassadors, and a Trustee of
the Center for the Study of the
Presidency and Congress. He is a
graduate of Georgetown University and
Georgetown University Law Center. He
also has Honorary Degrees from the
University of Notre Dame and the
University of Dallas.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/pope-francis-creates-confusion-putin-war-against-ukraine-rages
The Holy See and Putin’s War
By Former Rep. Francis Rooney (R-Fla.)
The Holy See has consistently deployed its “soft power” in the world
of foreign affairs and relations among states. From helping resolve
historic border disputes like the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494 to
securing the release of UK soldiers taken by Iran in 2007, the Holy
See has for several hundred years provided constructive intervention
into global problems. It was Pope Benedict in 2007 who called into
question Islamic radicalism in the 21st century—making the argument
that the Islamic world needed to fit into the modern world, and not
vice versa. Since that critical juncture, many Islamic scholars have
joined together with leaders of other faiths to seek consensus on
divorcing faith from radical and hostile actions. With war now
raging in Ukraine, where is the Holy See? And how has it chosen to
use its moral authority and influence?
In the Ukraine, the world now faces the worst brutality and
inhumanity since the Second World War and Stalin’s purges. Vladimir
Putin is actualizing his expressed long-term goal of regaining
territories lost after the fall of the Iron Curtain. For years, he
has longed for the territory held by Catherine the Great. Now, he’s
even comparing himself to Peter the Great in executing this
hegemonist aggression.
And the Holy See’s response?
While Pope Francis has made clear that he does not support the war
or Putin’s personal butchery, he has created more confusion than
resolution. He has nurtured, even if unintentionally, a false mantra
that, essentially, the West is to blame for Putin’s aggression by
having expanded NATO. As he said, quoting a source he valued, “They
are barking at the gates of Russia. They do not understand that the
Russians are imperialists and will allow no foreign power to
approach them.” Despite the lack of evidence of any NATO hostility
toward peaceful Russian actions, or the fact that NATO is in the
business of protecting western democracies, including our newest
members, Pope Francis has argued that (1) its expansion is itself an
aggression; and (2) that because it would offend a Russian
“imperialist” culture we have been the wrongdoers.
Unfortunately, an authoritarian strongman like Putin will only be
ennobled by these comments coming from the top of one of the West’s
most esteemed institutions. Appeasement has never worked. As
Churchill said, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile—hoping it
will eat him last.” In light of the history of Hitler and Stalin’s
co-option and then destruction of the Church, one would hope that
the pope would know this.
The pope has added to this confusion about the Holy See’s diplomacy
regarding the Ukraine war by criticizing those who see the war as a
struggle between good and evil. He advises those who view the war in
such stark black and white terms to abandon this “Little Red Riding
Hood” pattern of thought. He even contends that “there are no
metaphysical good guys and bad guys, in an abstract sense.” So a few
questions: what level of death and destruction are necessary to make
the wolf a malevolent aggressor? Has not the obliteration of a large
part of the Ukraine already accomplished this? Are there no
universal truths and objective realities? Is the pope actually
endorsing moral relativity?
Lastly, the pope has said that “While we see the ferocity, the
cruelty of Russian troops, we must not forget the ‘real problems’ if
we want them to be solved.” Is not the Russian war of attrition and
extermination a real enough problem?
The Holy See is an important participant in global diplomacy. It has
a long tradition of constructive value-added engagement so it is
especially unfortunate to see lost opportunities to bring moral
clarity—to clearly articulate who are the bad actors in this
conflict; and in an unqualified manner denounce the killing of
innocents, destruction of non-military buildings and factories, and
illegal and unjustified aggression by a foreign power into a
fledgling democracy. If the Holy See can’t say this clearly, who
will?
—Francis Rooney was a Republican member of the U.S. House of
Representatives, representing Florida's 19th District from
2017-2021. He also served as the U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See
from 2005 until 2008. |
BOOK: |
From
the centuries-long prejudices against Catholics in America, to the
efforts of Fascism, Communism and modern terrorist organizations to
“break the cross and spill the wine,” this book brings to life the
Catholic Church’s role in world history, particularly in the realm
of diplomacy. Former U.S. ambassador to the Holy See Francis Rooney
provides a comprehensive guide to the remarkable path the Vatican
has navigated to the present day, and a first-person account of what
that path looks and feels like from an American diplomat whose
experience lent him the ultimate insider’s perspective. Part memoir,
part historical lesson, The Global Vatican captures the braided
nature of religious and political power and the complexities,
battles, and future prospects for the relationship between the Holy
See and the United States as both face challenges old and new. |
|
"If cannabis legalization were an experiment it would be halted,
declared a failure, and found unethical" |
with Dr. Stuart
Reece |
 |
|
|
|
|
INDEX OF RADIO
SHOWS |
SEARCH |
|
WE THE PEOPLE RADIO |
|
|
|
|
About
Professor Albert Stuart Reece and Clinical Research

Dr. Stuart Reece is a family physician working in Brisbane
in Australia where he runs a large clinic with a special
interest in the medical treatment of drug addiction. He is
interested both in the underlying pathophysiology of drug
addiction – how drugs work in the body and why they are so
destructive to long term health – and also in the treatment
of drug addiction including its radical cure.
Dr Reece has a long standing interest in cannabinoids
particularly as they relate to genotoxicity, epigenotoxicity
and chromosomal and mitochondrial toxicity which have
downstream effects lasting for multiple generations. For
these reasons Dr Reece has published several epidemiological
research papers on cannabis-induced genotoxicity as
reflected in the incidence of both birth defects and cancer
development both in exposed adults and in the offspring of
exposed individuals and subsequent generations.
Dr Reece extensively uses advanced space-time statistical
analytical techniques and the formal techniques of causal
inference to analyze not just associations across space and
time simultaneously but also to quantitatively evaluate the
evidence for truly causal relationships.
Dr. Reece was appointed and now re-appointed a Professor in
the School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences at both
the University of Western Australia and Edith Cowan
University in recognition of his many contributions which
advance our understanding of the toxicopathophysiology and
treatment of drug addiction in general and cannabinoid
exposure in particular.
|
PREVIOUS SHOW WITH DR.
REECE:
April 3, 2022
"Cannabis
& Childhood Cancer"
December 12, 2021 "Cannabis
in ALL FORMS takes a Weed Whacker to Your Chromosomes" - Dr.
Stuart Reece (this includes smoking it, eating it, hemp
products AND also CBD in all forms) |
Cannabis
is known to
damage the brain
in many ways, is known to damage 70% of
human genes and is known to damage the cell software which controls
gene function for several generations.
Recent studies link cannabis use to most major
mental illnesses
including over 70 homicidal shooting
attacks in USA. Cannabis drives the exponential autism epidemic
which now affects over 5% of American boys.
Cannabis drove the doubling of American rate of
testicular cancer
and the 50% rise in the
rate of childhood cancer.
Cannabis has also been linked with many
other cancers.
Cannabis has also been linked with many
birth defects
including damage to the heart and bowels
hanging out. Data from both USA and Europe confirm that cannabis is
linked with babies born without arms and legs, just like
thalidomide.
Cannabis ages cells by over 30% and more as folks grow older.
It becomes hard to avoid the conclusion that the systematic doping
of the American public is closely linked with the orchestrated
duping of the American electorate at the ballot box.
If cannabis legalization
were an experiment it would be halted, declared a failure, and found
unethical. Massive
commercialization does not reverse the law of gravity. |
|
Conclusion: |
Looking across the broad vistas of the enormous
amount of data presented in this volume both in the detailed
epidemiological analyses and the extensive literature citations one
cannot but help being struck by the enormous concordance between
every level of the data. The present work is designed to provide
detailed and extensive data and analyses across the areas of enquiry
to complete these substantive gaps in the extent evidence base. The
domains examined include mental illness, autism, teratology,
carcinogenicity, epigenomics and aging including the overlap between
these areas.
In relation to neurotoxicity evidence of direct cannabinoid-mediated
inhibition of neuronal mitochondrial metabolism and oxidative
phosphorylation, imp[aired synaptogenesis, impaired synapse
reinforcement, impaired long term activation and depression,
impaired neuronogenesis (birth of new neurons), enhanced gliogenesis
(birth of new glial cells) relating in part to brain inflammation,
greatly impaired grey-white matter connectivity, blockade of the
major receptor ligand-pairs mediators of forebrain development
(slit-robo, retinoic acid and its receptors and the cerebellins)c
accord closely with the observed epidemiological pattern of diseases
at all developmental ages. Following in utero exposure this is
expressed as smaller heads and brains, microcephalus, severe
microcephalus and anencephaly and in infancy and childhood appears
as the autism spectrum of disorders and various intellectual
impairments and developmental delays. In adolescence and young
adulthood there are now well documented links with most major mental
disorders and all four metrics of mental illhealth measured by the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
With regard to genotoxicity again close concordance is clearly
demonstrated between adverse metabolic, genomic, epigenomic,
morphogen gradient data. There is very close agreement between
genotoxic assays conducted with mitochondria and chromosomes, and in
single cells, sperm, oocytes, animal models and the patterns of
congenital anomalies seen epidemiologically amongst humans. 59% of
the human genome was shown to be directly implicated by cannabis
genotoxicity in teratogenicity and cancerogenicity studies. There is
very close agreement between many epigenomic studies of cannabis
exposure. Concerningly there were 810 hits identified in the recent
longitudinal study from the North Carolina group and more than two
dozen cancers [1]. Direct and epigenomic damage to actin, tubulin
and the microtubules of the mitotic spindle and the chromosomes
which they control imply chromosomal instability and mis-segregation
which are known to underlie many cancers, teratogenic syndromes and
intellectual impairments [2, 3]. Overlap between cannabis and
thalidomide was demonstrated at both the mechanistic and clinical
phenomenological levels.
Many cannabinoids are implicated in these genotoxic effects
including Δ9THC, Δ8THC, cannabidiol, cannabigerol and cannabinol. It
is usual for assays of cannabinoid genotoxicity to demonstrate
exponential effects with rising dose level. It becomes important to
observe that this exponentiation observed experimentally has been
repeatedly confirmed by epidemiological studies of both
teratogenesis and carcinogenesis in clinical populations in
space-time frameworks. In the present context with rapidly rising
rates of cannabis use, rising cannabinoid concentrations and rising
rates of high intensity and daily use this exponentiation can be
expected to appear epidemiologically as relatively abrupt jumps in
cancer and teratogenic incidences, as are now well documented in
Colorado, France, Kentucky, Canada and Melbourne in Australia. This
plethora of pathways and mechanisms and the fundamental and
far-ranging impacts of these derangements makes the vast range of
malignant and teratogenic outcomes documented mechanistically
plausible.
In relation to aging and epigenomics cannabis has been shown to
disrupt the fundamental epigenomic machinery responsible for adding
and removing methyl groups to DNA and methyl and acetyl groups to
histones. Cannabis therefore disrupts the DNA methylome, the histone
code and the tubulin codes, and - because it is immune active and
affects aging – likely also disrupts the sophisticated and
far-reaching glycan code. Importantly the state of cells lineage
determination and differentiation determination are fixed by
interlocking and mutually reinforcing mechanisms between the
metabolome and the epigenome. The documentation of cannabinoid-dependent
disruption of both metabolome and epigenome necessarily implies that
this mutual metabolomic-epigenomic cellular locking apparatus is
perturbed, and cells are therefore at least poised for
de-differentiation and entry into a more primitive stem cell-like
state from which malignant transformation to cancer becomes more
likely. Since aging is characterized by a progressive loss of gene
function, and gene promoters are known to be increasingly methylated
with age, a body of evidence is fast accruing that whilst many
factors impinge upon the aging rate, the final common pathway and
mediator of aging is the epigenome. For this reason the recent
demonstration of accelerated cellular aging following cannabinoid
exposure is actually concordant with the now very uniform and robust
body of epigenomic literature.
Many lines of strong evidence of severe cytogenetic, metabolomic and
epigenomic damage to the oocyte and sperm indicate that the
appalling conclusion that egg and sperm are prematurely aged even
prior to fertilization - as is the resulting fertilized zygote - is
inescapable.
Epidemiologically upstream of these considerations are concerns
relating to food chain and indeed whole ecosystem contamination.
Large crops sewn to hemp necessarily contaminate the local water
table and this appears to be resulting in documented patterns of
disease in Kentucky and downstream Mississippi, in parts of France
and in Melbourne. Crustaceans in San Francisco bay with documented
levels of cannabinoids [4] implicates general upstream contamination
of the waterways of Northern California. This in turn implies that
the exposed populations have not been adequately warned of these
risks which further indicates that informed consent from populations
exposed to cannabinoid genotoxins and neurotoxins has neither been
sought nor obtained.
At the time of writing these is enormous research energy and
resources being poured into the potential of medicines active on the
endocannabinoid system as therapeutics and to this end thousands of
clinical trials are presently being conducted. It seems likely to us
that new agents are likely to enter clinical use from this large
body of drug development work. However as it does we would strongly
urge that the genotoxic – neurotoxic – aging considerations
documented herein be carefully born in mind when determining human
safety tests and fitness of compounds to come to market.
Prescribing information for US registered cannabinoid medicines “Sativex”,
“Epidiolex”, and Marinol all carry strident warnings for use by
soon-to-be or pregnant women, inclusive breast feeding, and for
potential fathers. Similarly unregulated hemp oil alleged to be low
in THC on supermarket shelves in Australia carries similar warnings.
These are the standard warnings for all genotoxic compounds
indicating that both regulatory agencies and agent marketers openly
acknowledge the genotoxicity of these products.
It becomes obvious from the concerns outlined above, and detailed
empirical and scientific data present in the current volume that the
current pro-cannabis legislation in many US States which has
bypassed established and expected community and Federally
established legal safeguards potentially constitutes one of the
major health risk of this century, not only to the consuming
individual but to the unborn child, to the broader community at
large, to all who have been and continue to be naïvely exposed and
to the next several generations.
In any formal sense the cannabis industry exits outside the
Federally established legal safeguards, and unfortunately, often
supported by US State legislation. However the central plank of any
business should be to place environmental and human safety before
profit. Towards this end industry, and indeed State legislators who
determine their ability of industry to operate require clear and
up-to-date scientifically validated empirical data upon which to
base their determinations and planning.
It is upon this gracious and virtuous quest that the present pages
embark. |
|
References
1. Schrott R, Murphy SK, Modliszewski JL, King DE, Hill B,
Itchon-Ramos N, Raburn D, Price T, Levin ED, Vandrey R et al: Refraining
from use diminishes cannabis-associated epigenetic changes in human
sperm. Environmental Epigenetics 2021, 7(1):1-10.
2. Drews RM, Hernando B, Tarabichi M, Haase K, Lesluyes T,
Smith PS, Morrill Gavarró L, Couturier DL, Liu L, Schneider M et
al: A pan-cancer compendium
of chromosomal instability. Nature 2022, 606(7916):976-983.
3. Steele CD, Abbasi A, Islam SMA, Bowes AL, Khandekar A,
Haase K, Hames-Fathi S, Ajayi D, Verfaillie A, Dhami P et al: Signatures
of copy number alterations in human cancer. Nature 2022, 606(7916):984-991.
4. California Water
Boards: State Water Resources Control Board: Water Boards Cannabis
Cultivation [https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/cannabis/]

|
|
|
|